Comments on: ClimateGate: Don’t Know Much About History. Or Climate.

By: garment sales worldwide

garment sales worldwide — Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:13:15 +0000

Check this out…

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……

By: N/A

N/A — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:38:54 +0000

Hello From America Harald,

Thank You.

Also, here is the corrected video link that you referred to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq0oa89-UE0

The one that you posted picked up the period at the end of you sentence and it wouldn't work.

By: Catching Up with Climate Change (global warming)

Catching Up with Climate Change (global warming) — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:34:11 +0000

[...] ClimateGate: Don’t Know Much About History. Or Climate. Imagine if a Bush administration official had said this: [...]

By: pete

pete — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:23:40 +0000

it's a bit cold out. I could use some global warming right now…… who's to say it wouldn't be a good thing?
http://www.carboncommand.com

By: Felipe

Felipe — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:35:27 +0000

Dear Mr Tallow, Svante Arrhenius was one of the most prominent scientist of the XIX century. He receive the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1903. The Greenhouse effect is overall good. Without it, the temperature would be below zero degrees. The bad thing is TOO MUCH greenhouse effect.

Before writing such things about someone that contributed so much to the science, please look at the books.

By: EdSki

EdSki — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:24:37 +0000

Agreed. And that's because the global debate about man made global warming is not, nor appareantly has it ever been, about science. Its all about emotions.

And you can not debate emotions, the are subjective, there is no absolutes. Science is about objective material, positively answered.

Dr. Thomas Sowell in his book on economics

http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Economics-3rd-Ed-Econ...

Uses the analogy of building a foot ball stadium. When it comes to the dimensions of the field, width, length, markings, there is no doubt what so ever. All the absolute answers can be found in the NFL rule book. You can be 100% you are absolutely correct.

Now, where to build, how to pay for it. Those are subjective questions. There is no absolute, 100% answer.

Subjective and objective questions should never be confused. Because objective questions are answered by science. Subjective questions are answered by politics.

By: EdSki

EdSki — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:16:12 +0000

I applaud you for your independence in the face of government mandate. But that has nothing to do with the subject under discussion. That question is a simple mathematical equation that can be verified with a calculator, and requires no trillions of dollars of wealth be seized, and personal freedom taken from us. I said, "x = 2. The question is solved. End of debate." Here's what the CRU is proved doing. "The question is solved. End of debate." And I'm saying, what was the original equation? And they reply "The question is solved. End of debate." And we say, well can't you at least let us see the equation you used? And they reply "The question is solved. End of debate." And skeptics say we want to see what you did? And they reply "The question is solved. End of debate." Then the emails came out and they said “I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone.” Then the University said they would release all process and data as soon as they could. Then the CRU said Oops, we accidentally deleted the data And you expect me to buy it? You can if you want. Many people do. I know plenty who are more than happy to stuff their fingers in their ears and scream "Lalalalalalala." But interestingly enough, they are not the technical people I work with. If you know about science, and you've been in a lab, you know this is pure BS.