Minority Groups to FCC: Not so Fast on Net Neutrality
by Capitol ConfidentialThe Federal Communications Commission’s bid to reengineer the nation’s broadband regulatory regime is exposing some fissures in the fragile net neutrality coalition, as a collection of minority groups Monday warned the commission against its controversial reclassification bid.

In a letter to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate energy and commerce committees, the groups–seventeen in total, including 100 Black Men of America, the Japanese American Citizens League and the Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education fund–urged congressional action to clarify the scope of the FCC’s authority as it relates to broadband regulation.
“In light of the FCC’s recent adoption of a Notice of Inquiry on broadband classification, we … have concerns about the unintended implications that such efforts could have on the state of broadband deployment and adoption across the country,” an advanced copy of the letter read.
Recent studies have warned the FCC that tinkering with the broadband regulatory regime could, in addition to retarding investment and innovation, upend the nation’s economy, killing upwards of 600,000 jobs and shrinking the nation’s aggregate economic output by $80 billion.
For now at least, the groups remain in the net neutrality fold. But they agree with skeptics that a legislative end-run could have adverse affects on broadband infrastructure and industry jobs and investment.
“Rather, we urge you and your colleagues in Congress to step in and clarify the scope and direction of the FCC’s authority, thereby restoring certainty and clarity to the broadband environment,” the letter said.
Of course, the minority groups are not alone in their challenge to the FCC’s reclassification scheme: Cross-chamber counts reveal at least 285 lawmakers–76 of whom are Democrats–oppose the FCC’s plan to reclassify broadband a Title II telecommunications.
The groups write: “As a bipartisan majority of Congress has voiced their opposition to the FCC’s proposal, we hope that you will heed our request and offer a compromise moving forward.”
Appended below is a full copy of the letter and its signatories.
The Honorable John Rockefeller
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
253 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
253 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510The Honorable Henry Waxman
House Committee on Energy and Commerce
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515The Honorable Joe Barton House Committee on Energy and Commerce
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515July 18, 2010
Dear Chairmen Rockefeller and Waxman, Ranking Members Hutchison and Barton:
In light of the FCC’s recent adoption of a Notice of Inquiry on broadband classification, we, the undersigned civil rights and other organizations, have concerns about the unintended implications that such efforts could have on the state of broadband deployment and adoption across the country. Rather, we urge you and your colleagues in Congress to step in and clarify the scope and direction of the FCC’s authority, thereby restoring certainty and clarity to the broadband environment.
Over the past several months, we have all urged the Commission to diligently pursue the goals of the National Broadband Plan, as contemplated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that you signed into law on February 17, 2009. Since the release of the Plan in March, we have applauded the Commission’s efforts to bridge the digital divide in this country and connect all Americans to the Internet.
Therefore, we are concerned that the Commission’s proposed regulations could be a distraction from efforts to implement the National Broadband Plan. By injecting uncertainty into the broadband market, we fear that proposed regulations could have detrimental effects on investment, innovation and job creation. As staff from the Commission has estimated that it will take up to $350 billion to deploy broadband nationally, those underserved by broadband cannot afford a decrease in future investments. Nor can American workers, who we must rely upon to build out broadband infrastructure across the country. The goal of closing the digital divide and creating jobs in our communities should be at the forefront of our broadband policy agenda at this time.
We plan on continuing to educate our constituencies about the possible unintended outcomes that the FCC’s proposal poses to our communities. As a bipartisan majority of Congress has voiced their opposition to the FCC’s proposal, we hope that you will heed our request and offer a compromise moving forward. Furthermore, we are encouraged by a June 18 letter from the AFL-CIO, NAACP, LULAC and other leading labor, environmental and civil rights organizations to Congressional leaders, also calling for a legislative solution.
Our highest priorities should be wiring our communities and putting people back to work. We encourage you to take this opportunity to further drive this momentum providing certainty and clarity to broadband regulation.
Sincerely,
Albert E. Dotson, Jr
Chairman of the Board
100 Black Men of AmericaRuby G Moy Interim
Executive Director
Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional StudiesRonald Blackburn-Moreno
President & CEO
ASPIRANestor Montilla
President
Dominican American National RoundtableGus West Board
Chair and President
The Hispanic Institute
Co-Chair
Hispanic Telecommunication and Technology PartnershipS. Floyd Mori
National Executive Director
Japanese American Citizens LeagueMilton Rosado
National President
Labor Council for Latin American AdvancementJose Marquez
President & CEO
Latinos in Information Sciences and Technology AssociationJ.D. Hokoyama
President & CEO
Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics, Inc.Alma Riojas
President & CEO
MANA: A National Latina OrganizationAnthony W. Robinson
President
Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.Dr. Lezli Baskerville
President and Chief Executive Officer
National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education (NAFEO)Ricardo C. Byrd
Executive Director
National Association of NeighborhoodsMelanie Campbell
Executive Director
National Coalition of Black Civic ParticipationRafael Fantauzzi
President & CEO
National Puerto Rican CoalitionGeorge C. Wu
Executive Director
Organization of Chinese AmericansDr. Juan Andrade
President and CEO
US Hispanic Leadership Institute






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
31 Comments
Since when has logic or the thought of saving PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS been a concern for this administration?
Why should I compromise on an infringement on my freedom of speech and ability to search for information? Shoot it down, no compromise.
The number of power grabs being made by this government is simply staggering.
My intuition tells me that this can't be good for US. It feels like more Socialist intrustion into our lives. No amount of political rhetoric or reassurance can make me feel otherwise.
Keep the Internet free! Keep the Federal Government out of it. I think we need TOWN HALLS across America for this, just to force the dialogue.
This scares me. I don't trust one person in this Federal Government. Obama's motives are suspect i.m.o.
I believe that there is already a passive/aggressive shutting down of the internet going on.
When we heard about the internet "kill switch" I believe that was a diversion or a play of words that was deliberately meant to deceive America. When we think of a "kill switch" being thrown we envision that it is like a light switch in a dark room, if the switch is turned off everything goes dark and we are not able to see anything. The image that we have been encouraged to have on the internet "kill switch" is that it may one day simply be turned off and we will no longer have access.
Simply ask yourself "how was/is the internet controlled in China?" They have internet access however, they only have access to what their government wants them to have access to. Why would it be any different here? The internet was originally built for use by our military – Do you really think that the government is going to throw a "kill switch" that would shut the whole thing down?
Goverment access to the internet = a Commodore 64 and a 2400 baud modem for everyone!!! yay!!!
And don't worry about the cost! That computer system will pay for itself in the first 20 years! yay!!!
I like well organized cable runs. Those look OK.
How is any of this within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government anyway? It isn't.
So stop it.
Any other damn questions?
Having a gov't agency in charge of keeping anything neutral is sort of like having Bill Clinton in charge of the virtue of female White House interns.
Well, if there is a bright side to this article …… it would have to be that there appears to be another crack forming in the great Progressive Tower of Peace and Love. OK, fine. Whatever it takes to bring that sucker down.
But, I'm with Phillep Harding, compromise is too dangerous to accept……..but, it is kinda cool to watch them eating each other.
Agreed, no compromise. Compromising is their modis operandi to chip away at our freedoms.
just look at this paragraph of the letter:
"As a bipartisan majority of Congress has voiced their opposition to the FCC’s proposal, we hope that you will heed our request and offer a compromise moving forward. Furthermore, we are encouraged by a June 18 letter from the AFL-CIO, NAACP, LULAC and other leading labor, environmental and civil rights organizations to Congressional leaders, also calling for a legislative solution."
A legislative solution to what? What made up problem do we need "Net Neutrality" for?
First of all, I don't want THIS congress to do any more of anything. I wish they would all just sit on their asses for the next five months and whittle wood.
Second of all, I don't want the unions, the environmental groups, the minority groups having anything to do with anything in this nation. And what the hell does civil rights have to do with this? Oh yeah, they are saying the internet is a RIGHT, you know, like healthcare.
Anything the FCC does other than back the hell off is a power grab, is bad for free speech and is likely a gateway to all sorts of taxes and fees we'll all have to pay in addition to whatever we pay now for internet access to fund the people who can't afford it.
Great, like I don't pay enough taxes already.
That and I'm so sure that if the goverment pokes its fat, bloated, diseased nose into the internet, it won't screw anything up.
Yeah, right.
Don't'cha know – there can't be ANYTHING in the U.S. that we can't control. And if we can't control it, we will RUIN it and drive it out of existence.
That's not an opinion…that's a stone cold fact! His motives ARE suspect.
You can bet that was a private sector company that made them too! It looks like an AT&T room to my eye.
Even if the Government ripped their portion of the backbone out, we'd find a way to keep it up and even make it better.
Much like fat women and spandex…just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Leave our internet alone!
More to the point – hey, Mr. US Gubbmint! YOU DON'T OWN THE INFRASTRUCTURE, so stop telling the people who do what they should be doing with it.
Or would you like it stated more, um, colloquially?
No, they will just control US as they have done on Wall St., in our Medical Care, with our Taxes, for 'stimulus,' and they still have a Trillion and a half put aside to use in Oct, just before the elections! I wonder who will benefit from those entitlements? and Cap & Tax and Amnesty to close his First Act as Charles Krauthammer aptly calls it.
- I'm still wondering where the Impeachment papers are. Are there no attorneys that find this to be Crimes against the people? or whatever grounds you need for it. If Clinton can be Impeached, I think Obama can be.
If they know you are simply staggering, they will try harder. Until you are flat on your face.
Whoopieeee.
Now that's a winning attitude. Efffing 'A brother.
Sure, and they'll probably have a $45 voucher to buy that shiny old modem.
Sounds like a bunch of poor minorities wanting internet but living out in the middle of the desert and can't get it because it is not economically feasible to run service to BFE.
Cheap bastards need to move in town or pony up for the related costs to watch porn.
He He He….. I love the lefts reaction…..Hey man… you’re not supposed to infringe on our freedoms or life style…only the other guys.
The E. German Stasis went after the journalists, actors, artists and author’s right out of the gate.
They understood what drove a culture. What do people expect from authoritarian socialists?
The internet is the last bastion of true human freedom (Liberalism). But not for long.
EVEN THOSE DEEMED AS PRIVILEGED (Vote buying scheme, pitting neighbor against neighbor) are starting to shake off the blanket of false love, bestowed upon them by the "Progressives"!!!!
These folks are only interested in serving themselves and getting special treatment from whatever the FCC does. They could give a crap about the implications of FCC authority over the internet. The internet works fine the way it is. The only problem for the government is that they don't have control over something.
The scariest thing Obama ever said was that too much information "was a distraction." It starts with net neutrality, then it moves to exposing anonymous bloggers, then it moves to regulation of content, then who knows what else. Screw the FCC!
Bingo! We have a winner with your very first sentence. I can see this proposal being haggled over, hearings held, groups consulted, etc. In the end special interests (translation: liberals) will go along as long as their concerns are met, but screw anyone they disapprove of.
The ignorant dumba**s in the Congress continue to allow the Executive Branch to steal their power, and make them irrelevant. They don't deserve their pay, much less the prestige of being Congressmen or Senators.
They might as well drop their drawers, and bend over before Dictator Obama, one by one, publicly. Or in the case of my reps, Congressman Perriello, and Senators Webb and Warner, get down on their knees and open wide…
There are no minorities in America.Only Americans.
Anyone who says different has an agenda.Period.
You must be logged in to post a comment.