Democrats Back FCC in Anticipated Efforts to Regulate Broadband
by Capitol ConfidentialIn the wake of the Court of Appeals judgment last week that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lacks sufficient authority to regulate broadband services, senior congressional Democrats are reaffirming their support for alternative methods of executing what some critics charge would be a de facto government takeover of the internet.

Rep. Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts and co-author of the House’s Internet Freedom Preservation Act, said the FCC should “take any actions necessary to ensure that consumers and competition are protected on the internet,” and offered to “continue to work with my colleagues in Congress to provide the Commission any additional authority it may need to ensure the openness of the Internet for consumers, innovators and investors.”
Markey, like FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is a backer of net neutrality, a policy that would inadvertently be instituted were the FCC to reclassify broadband services under existing rules relating to telephone services, and directly instituted were his bill passed and signed into law.
Fellow Massachusetts Democrat Sen. John Kerry, meanwhile, insisted that while it is within the authority of the FCC to reclassify broadband he is not advocating such aggressive action.
“I am not advocating that the FCC reclassify broadband services as a result of this decision,” Kerry, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said. “But I absolutely believe they maintain that legal authority and it would be entirely consistent with the history of communications laws in our country if they did.”
Kerry went on to say that Congress did not intend for ”cable and telephone broadband internet service providers to fall outside of the authority of the FCC,” and therefore that he would be willing to work with “all interested parties” on the construction of “a new legal and regulatory framework for broadband, especially if reclassifying broadband as a telecommunications service proves too difficult to administer.”
Democratic FCC commissioners, for their part, seem determined to attempt to reclassify broadband as a Title II service, which (if done successfully) would enable the agency to effectively regulate the internet and institute net neutrality by the back door.
“The only way the Commission can make lemonade out of this lemon of a decision is to do now what should have been done years ago: treat broadband as the telecommunications service it is,” Michael J. Copps said. “We should straighten this broadband classification mess out before the first day of summer.”
Observers say that if the FCC does what is being discussed, it is likely to kick off “World War III,” with broadband providers effectively going to battle with the agency in what could be a politically messy showdown, in which other groups who firmly oppose net neutrality—including, prominently, minority and civil rights organizations— could also weigh in.
Congressional Republicans have vehemently opposed both plans to institute net neutrality and to pursue reclassification, with Rep. Joe Barton saying last month that ”The worst idea I’ve heard in years is reclassification.” He added that “I don’t want to regulate broadband like we regulated telephone services in the 1930s.” In addition, Republican Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan and Genachowski had a lengthy exchange when Genachowski appeared before House members to discuss regulation of the internet. Rep. Rogers’ office says he does not believe such regulation via direct institution of net neutrality or reclassification is the best way to encourage innovation and increase investment in broadband infrastructure, two ostensible goals of net neutrality advocates.
Observers say it bears noting in all of this, however, that, skepticism of and opposition to net neutrality has not been confined just to Republican ranks: Last year, 72 House Democrats signaled doubts about net neutrality in a letter to Genachowski.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
507 Comments
Government sez: You businesses with billions invested in infrastructure may continue to own your property, just as long as you obey.
IOW, Cyber-Fascism
The people will not endure any action by ANY president that has the effect of limiting ANYONE'S free speech doing so invalidates the constitutional contract and the people will take appropriate action in response.
This "**president" is already attempting to "eliminate" the White House press corps, an absolutely unprecedented act in American history and treasonous at best.
God forgive the American people for ever electing him…
It is, indeed, the most transparent presidency…
The most transparently autocratic
The most transparently radical
The most transparently opaque
Note to Government:
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
The fact that this seems to be so important to the dems is what really worries me. Clearly the internet is not broken and needs no additional legislation. Countries around the world are moving to filter content and this smells like an attempt to do so here. I don't know a lot about this bill as its very secretive but what I hear makes me scratch my head and wonder what's going on. Unless they can prove that the internet is broken somehow I say hands off!
Well of course the Democrats are 'backing' the FCC to regulate the internet: Regulating the internet is precisely what this administration is after. Are they trying to imply that they're just now coming on board with the issue?
As if we didn't already know that regulating the internet was their idea from the beginning–they've essentially got the newspapers and the TV; the final frontier of opposition is the internet and a likely choice of democratic control.
You know how it goes. No matter how much you've contributed to society's betterment, the question from government is always "What have you done for me lately"? It's a lot easier to ask that question since they busted up Ma Bell.
It seems that government can't make up it's mind. One day they're busting up monopolies and the next day they're trying to create monopolies. The only difference is the ones they want to create…THEY get to control. It would be simpler just to take over the existing monopolies, wouldn't it? Oh, wait! They're already doing that! GM, AIG, education loans, health care. Wow! Government IS efficient! who'd a thunk it?
I don't know what they are so worried about! They have had every chance to get on radio and television, to get their point of view across…if nobody cares, what makes them think that if people are FORCED to listen to only them, any minds will be changed?? Guess they don't know anything about underground radio…??? They can TRY to stifle us but the TRUTH will always find it's way OUT!!!
Sorry Hanoi John, you have nothing to say of credible value. In my book, your treasonous ass should have never been allowed to obtain an out of jail pass.
He IS "transparent" we can all see right through his deceptions and skulking in the shadows.
It all comes down to controll and money.
IF your thought passes muster with the FCC, "a penny for your thoughts" may actually be the case.
Aah, the control freak party goes on and on ad-nauseum.
This is where we must make a stand…
I find it very disturbing we have a 'Press' who's sole objective is to brainwash and misinform, people need to ask why…in spite of plummeting profits, the 'press' continues to provide cover for the Government…It really is chilling, I have never seen this kind of pure propagandist 'press' in my entire life…
It is well know the FCC is stocked with Progressive nitwits promoting the 'fairness doctrine', and ultimate control of the internet…the last battlefield of public opinion where currently we have An army of Davids who have taken up the role of our nation's watchdogs, the the MSM has abdicated…
We must keep the internet free and unfetter by government control…
When has regulation by the government ever led to greater freedom?
Simple Rule of Thumb: believe the antonym of whatever dems label something: ie Employee Free Choice
They've confused us with Europeans, rckmom. Just a (dis)honest mistake.
Just to build on this idea a little bit, it occurs to me that in a properly running republic, out side of the event of war or ceremony, we should be able to live our lives with little notice that we even HAVE a president. Outside of budgetary matters and foreign policy legislation, we should hardly care that we have the US Congress. And except for matters of dispute between the States and defense of the Constitution, we should never need to rely on the Supreme Court.
We need to begin the work of deconstructing the federal government and diversifying governing responsibility back to the States.
The left always sings the praises of "diversity." Let's make them start to live by their own rules.
Free is for me but not for thee. That's the rules of the Democrats.
"Six months and 21 days till the PARTIES OVER!!!"
Let's make sure we keep our wits about us between the November elections and the end of the year, when this parasitical lame duck congress will try to ram through every offensive piece of legislation imaginable. We already know we'll have a hard time with "repeal" as long as we still have Ojama in the White House.
Damn it, you stupid DimocRAT fascists!! My rates just went up because of deathcare and a class-action suit. Now these idiots are going to make them even higher because of further litigation and with infrastructure and administrative threats and mandates. And what do the Dims want besides total control? Taxation! They distract by caressing the back bone while they salivate in anticipation of devouring the entrails and leaving no scrap behind.
The leftist computer nerd crowd that loves Bit Torrent and other mass download sites seem unable to wrap their minds around their big government control view, and the internet, as the last bastion of liberal freedom.
Go figure:)
L4S
Net Neutrality (Internet) = Fairness Doctrine (TalkRadio)
Not matter what kind of mumbojumbo smoke and mirrors they try to hid behind…
Algore, and other Marxists, is on the board at GOOGLE…
wildwil
They want control of all communication methods….
NET neutrality (Internet) = Fairness Doctrine (TalkRadio)..
Not matter what kind of mumbojumbo smoke and mirrors they try to hid behind…
Algore, and other Marxists, is on the board at GOOGLE…
Countries around the world already DO filter content. Hussein, with his Euro-centric & African Colonial world view, just wants us to 'catch up' to the rest of the world, yet again.
They want "free" crap, no matter who pays but they are willing to sacrifice liberty to get it…
WW-edUP
To me "control" and "taxation" are the two sides of the same coin…
Money is Freedom…
When they "control" your money thru excessive taxes,
they (the GOV), takes your FREEDOM!!! (Breitheart scream)!!!
"Our message to the GOP then should be to run on a platform of State's responsibilities and sovereignty, and a shift of the regulatory system out of the hands of the centralized government and back to the State and Local officials who best represent the People."
Amendment 10 – Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791.
• The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
It all boils down to twenty-eight simple words, and holding elected officials to the oath they pledge to fulfill and uphold.
Our remarkable forefathers forsaw that "tyranny" was the greatest threat that America would always face. We failed to to do all we could to protect the liberty passed to us. The GOP needs to be the party of the Constitution.
Randy
P.S. on that note to Guber'ment
and we're all going "broke",
so get TF out of our way so "we" can fix it…
The control freak party shows us the way –
If they are for it, we need to be against it,
If they are against it, we need to be for it.
Any questions – consult the Constitution.
What part of "The Constitution is no longer in effect" do people not understand???
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."
~ Ronald Reagan ~
If "they" don't get it, fire their _ss.
They should really be nothing more than glorified security guards.
And they'll never listen. It's easy to understand their stubbornness on the issue….they haven't sense enough to be confused. Facts don't matter when you're always right. They'll find out soon enough when they're all screaming.. "SOMEBODY SEED!!! Dude…why no seeders? It's my right to steal Blu-ray" then they find out govt shut it all down.
"It all boils down to twenty-eight simple words, and holding elected officials to the oath they pledge to fulfill and uphold."
We all agree that the 10th Amendment should be central to the limitation of the feds. Unfortunately we've allowed bastardization of the Constitution to occur Washington. Namely:
Article 1 – The Legislative Branch
Section 8 – Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Until we can reign in the power grab that has taken place regarding what the Commerce Clause allows the federal government to do, we will never regain adherence to the provisions of the 10th Amendment.
This is why I believe we will need to work on ratifying a new amendment to the Constitution defining the language found in the Commerce Clause and limiting any and all interpretation of that federal power to those few enumerated powers found within the original document.
We can no longer rely on the Supreme Court to limit federal power over the States.
Marxist/Socialist aggression…..
Control or undermine the economy and you lessen opportunity and the attainmanet of the American dream…
Limit FREE SPEECH (1st amendment) and you strike fear in vocal retribution and meetings (net neutrality)…
Confiscate guns (2nd amendment) and American freedom is forever lost to the tyrants….
It's come to this. A NOVEMBER to REMEMBER ! Defund the Marxists with control of the House. Grab the Senate as a bonus to tie the hands of the Traitor-in-Chief, the childish, petty, incompetent, smarmy Barack POS Obama !
In the inimitable words of the great Ted Nugent, right wing rocker extraordinaire:
"Comin' up that street, jackboots steppin' high.
Got to make a stand.
Looking in your windows and listen to your phone.
Keep a gun in your hand.
Get ready. Stormtroopers comin'."
He's right – they're comin' – get ready –
Comin' up that street, jackboots steppin' high.
Got to make a stand.
Looking in your windows and listen to your phone.
Keep a gun in your hand.
Get ready. Stormtroopers comin'.
Comin' up that street, jackboots steppin' high.
Got to make a stand.
Looking in your windows and listen to your phone.
Keep a gun in your hand.
Get ready. Stormtroopers comin'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHOFt0axxdk&fe...
Cool! What I wouldn't give for a candidate today who was as witty and personable (and right thinking) as President Reagan was.
Hint: Were The Constitution still in effect, government imposed limits on the internet wouldn't even be on the table.
Hint: Were The Constitution still in effect, the government wouldn't have taken over GM, bailed out financial corporations or enacted a law forcing people to use government controlled health care programs. (If you read and examine the Republican version of health care, its violations of The Constitution are only a matter of degree as compared to the Democrat version which was passed into 'law.')
None of these government actions falls under anything in The Constitution.
None of them.
The very thought of any of these actions is in direct opposition to The Constitution.
In view of both recent and historical trends in the growth of government power over our lives, anyone who thinks The Constitution is still in effect is not thinking rationally. They are, at best, living in denial of reality.
Us "right wingnut, fascist, biggoted, etc" will fight it. The Left will support anything they think will shut down anyone they disagree with, never realizing that they are not going to be in power forever.
(Well, for such children, one year is "forever".)
The truth gets out eventually. It's what happens in the meantime that hurts.
Just as those killed by Pol Pot.
You want to make the net and airwaves neutral, Democrats? Find liberals people actually want to read and listen to, simple as that.
Too bad Air America was a flop (even in liberal NYC) and NPR is publically-funded joke. Daily Kos is one d**k joke after another in their articles and there isn't even a twinge of professionalism there.
Awesome! That's one of his coolest solos after the more mellow "Stranglehold". Hopefully that title will be relevant to our enemies, soon enough.
“Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” – Ronald Reagan
The internet is thriving because it's not taxed and no one is bleeding money out of it.
Radical Socialists in the congress and administration endanger our very existence. John F. Kerry returned from Vietnam and joined the communist party movement. Nothing has changed in nearly fifty years. I will admit that Kerry is not so far left as Obama.
Our own government is the greatest danger our liberty faces, it is systematically usurping our Constitutional rights. Nearly every member of the congress is in violation of their oath of office. The Supreme Court also systematically undermines our natural rights.
Exactly. There's a nice padded room with a straight jacket awaiting these idiots.
Yup, all over but for the cryin. And rest assured, we will hear it. Wah, wah, wah, whine, whine, whine. It's the Democratic party mantra – WHINE.
Dear Senator Kerry,
I have three questions for you:
1. Do you have a lot of physical discomfort from that broomstick up your a$$?
2. Does that dried up walnut rattling around inside your head make a lot of noise?
3. Do you miss licking the space between Ted Kennedy's toes? (Was there ketchup involved?)
As sure as God is Good and Gracious….these evil dolts will rot in hell.
I agree! A good strategy would be to keep a list of all the boondogle legislation that the people want rectified as soon as we seat a conservative congress. OBAMA will not sign it but conservative reps can sure as dickens not allow funding for it!
You know all those taxes and fees tacked onto your phone bill? Well, imagine a fee for every MB you download. Some kind of monthly "Net Neutrality" fee that you have to pay based on your usage of the web every time you pay your broadband provider.
It's amazing how many big, scary things MIGHT happen to us if the Gov't doesn't rescue us. I'm a lot more scared of the things that are ACTUALLY being done to us by the Gov't!! Will this ever end?
It doesn't matter what the FCC regulates or censor's, all you're going to be hearing, and all you're going to be reading, and all of the people will know that for the next 2.5 years……..
_____________________nOBAMA'S HIT A NEW LOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!_______________________
you better get use to hearing those 5…………………………………Oh so very SIMPLE word's. ………….
…once again the Democrats sell out their country for want of power. Once again, why is this a surprise?
We can't have socialism until everything is under government control.
This sounds similar to what the EPA is doing with the Climate joke. I would say we have a tyrannical government on our hands.
Lies and more lies.
The war is coming to the streets of America and if you are not keeping and bearing and practicing with your arms then you will be helpless and you will be the victim of evil.
Ted Nugent
The 33rd Annual Dallas International Guitar Festival at Dallas Market Hall held over April 16, 17, 18 where Ted will have a booth and will be participating in an all-star jam session on the Sunday.
Visit GuitarShow.com for more details!
Here is my prediction…since the internet is an extension of phone service, whatever phone laws are on the books, they will find nice loopholes to 'standardise'(i.e., control/destroy?)internet service and transmission.Enjoy free internet while you can…
I don't think that the congress can get a net-neutrality bill passed, but I wouldn't put it passed the FCC to "re-classify" the service. I'm wondering if the supreme court could do anything about reclassification.
Net Neutrality has nothing to do with the Fairness Doctrine.
We need a Consitutional Convention.
Remove the words "..for the General Welfare" from it.
Specify the things that the Federal Government does not have authority to make laws regarding.
It is the only way to put a stop to this.
Net Neutrality has nothing to do with the Fairness Doctrine.
When you go to Yahoo or Google and you search for something, they send you a list. If you are against Net Neutrality, then you believe that your ISP has the right to take that list before you see it and change it to show you things the ISP wants you to see. If you are for Net Neutrality, then you believe that just because you logon via an ISP, that does not give them the right to modify your exchange with Google.
Each week, heck it feels like each day they're trying to ram things through!
The thing about a constitutional convention is it works both ways. The progressives can then try to add or take away amendments as well as conservatives.
Americans must begin to understand that progressivism is tyranny. Its foundational value is that there is NO individual liberty, and that all individuals must be forced into abeyance to the state. I've been studying a great deal about the roots of progressivism, its heroes and their writings. They are tyrants who, in their early days, worshiped Soviet socialism and fascist socialism — both brands. Yes, fascism is fundamentally socialist. Its ends are fundamentally leftist! Hitler and Mussoulini were both socialists.
Progressivism is incompatible with personal liberty, our Constitution, and Christianity. One or the others will survive. If progressivism wins, liberty in America will be lost, probably for at least our lifetimes.
Tyranny has found a home in America!
Yes, but each individual amendemnt would be voted up or down by the state legislatures. So, they can propose whatever they like, but its doubtful they would pass. I believe 3/4's of the states would have to pass any amendment. America is largely a center-right country, plus if you've ever seen an electoral map of voting habits in this country, liberalism is generally isolated to large urban centers.
It's clear the Constitution is being overridden by leftwing and we need to stand up and reinforce it as the basis for any law.
Progressives are like herpes. No matter what you do they keep coming back.
hehehehehehe
A word of caution to Obama and his munchkins:
One must be very careful in politics, for the toes you might step on now, on one's rise to the top, might be attached to the buttocks which one must kiss in one's descent to the
very bottom. Ya'll might want to practice that pucker between now and November.
How dare kerry use the American Flag in a photo-op. He and all of his ilk should stop insulting Americans with their charade of being "Americans" themselves.
Indeed. We have long since passed the point of "taxation without representation".
Total control is what it is all about. Freedom of speech gives them too much of a problem. Can't have anything made for public consumption that the MSM and the democratic party didn't first approve. We are being run by a shadow, socialist bunch whose goal is to take our few freedoms we have left, away. Lurch here, is an ignorant joke. If the truth gets out, it is bad for the liberals.
Wow, I'm ignorant on the Net Neutrality issues and complexities behind it, yikes. Thanks for giving me better information.
[...] More on this posted by Capitol Confidential, Big Government: Democrats Back FCC in Anticipated Efforts to Regulate Broadband [...]
I'm scared to death of a lame duck session, we may need to plan on civil disobedience
in DC during that time. I'm not usually of that mind-set, but we've already seen Pigloi's
victory lap after she WON, what will she do after losing?
uuuuu, ww,…….was that road-kill ???
I think AlistZ is a misspelling of Alinski.
Notice the hand to his ear, wha……..never even heard it. What was the answer that Kerry claimed he
had never heard of? Botox ! Now look at his forehead in this picture, see those horizontal lines all
the way across, they were not there during his last campaign. But he had never heard of Botox ? Was
the dermatologist calling it bug piss? 2 bit lyin' sack o' sh!t !
I would not bet my savings (or a doughnut) that the bill stops there.
Only 49% of the private wealth left for the Leftists to "git".
The 'net' result of net neutrality would be control to tax content and volume. Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
There really needs to be a major shift in thinking when it comes to the federal government. When you realize that every single issue, debate, action, and policy for the entire country revolves around the whims of the federal government, something has gone terribly wrong.
You see, I'm not that interested in just changing policies in Washington, even if we elect a strong conservative majority to do "better things." What we really need is for Washington to STOP "doing things." We need a major, permanent purge of federal overreach.
So the issue here is not whether the feds should pursue net neutrality or not. But that the federal government should never again be allowed to even approach the subject. Or any one of a hundred other federal intrusions into the sovereignty of the States or of the People.
Our message to the GOP then should be to run on a platform of State's responsibilities and sovereignty, and a shift of the regulatory system out of the hands of the centralized government and back to the State and Local officials who best represent the People.
What is totally amazing is that the Internet is the only industry that has been thriving. But what the hell since Big Al invented it his cronies can control and tax it to death. We already have our email lists and Tea Party set-ups in place and whatever damage they do we will get to clean up soon enough.
It used to be a swamp but since Barack Hussein Obama came to town the White House and Congress have both diverted all the raw sewage and now it is a fetid cesspool full of their excrement!!!
Six months and 21 days till the PARTIES OVER!!!
We're all roadkill if the Dims aren't stopped.
The only segment of our workforce that has not been affected by the economic downturn is Government and they want raises. Look for, carefully, the Union Label. Lock and Load.
Sounds like we will need to go back to "ham" radio to hear the truth… if the progressive/Marxists have their way. 10 4 good buddy. We will not be silenced.
Fascism alright! Bastards!
Dear God please deliver us from these evil fascist bastards!
Kerry is a big pice of bull shit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW THE HELL HE GOT WHER HE AT I WILL NEVER KNOW.
AZ
Sure it does, both designed to limit free speech (TRadio) and our choices on the Internet (Net Neut)
Seems like both are the focus of Marxists in the FCC…
They don't say that is their intention, but that will be the effect…
But you may think what you like, as it is still a sorta free country…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality
We own and operate a WISP (wireless internet service) and as far as we're concerned, since we paid for it and operate it the government can kiss our A$$ !!
The only system management we do is QoS for VOIP.
These fools in Congress don't know the difference between an IP and the AP!
True enough. Then there's the "control" this regime prefers which affects consumer costs (trickle down taxation) as per fascistic govt. dictates and added bureaucratic bloat.
Kerry got there the old-fashioned way: He married into money — twice. That's the main reason why Boston Herald columnist Howie Carr called Kerry "the most successful gigolo in the United States" in 2004.
Believe me, I know. This will be the longest 6 months in American history. We, the People and the GOP are going to have to stand tall and take this assault on our laws and liberties for half a year before we get the opportunity to put an end to the madness. Dig in and grit your teeth.
I will concede your point. Reckon I didn't think it all the way through. My spouse is not one to see a conspiracy behind every tree, but she seems to think the Dims will manufacture some kind of crisis in order to call off or postpone the next election. I don't see it myself, but I'm just sayin'
LoL, verrrrrrry true.
Are there ANY Dims who AREN'T double-talking, traitors. November can't come soon enough…but we can only hope it IS soon enough! Barry with his Mighty Maoist Minions, augmented with hari-Kerry & the rest of the Pro-aggressive, a*holes is daunting. J. Edgar was a creepy guy but we sure could use him now. Since the MSM knew that that Barry et al couldn't pass muster – they skipped that little "inconvenient truth" – ol' J. Edgar would have relished the task. But then, Barry wouldn't have been electable! I would feel soooo much safer if the FBI/NSA etc took away his security clearance! Oh, to see all of them standing trial! -If they finish locking everything down 1st – it'll be us standing trial in a kangaroo court. God Help US…
I have said before
the whole thing confuses the hell outta me
people have tried to explain it but i still dont get it
I will need to let those with more savvy than I decide
the correct approach and hope I make the right decision
on this
I need to put my tin foil hat back on.
Your wife has been probing my brain.
Tell her to stop…… for pity's sake… tell her to stop
Hippie
This is a good beginning…From "Faux News"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,590506,00.htm...
The debate between him and Sarah
which ever one shoots and guts the first buck wins the election
You must be logged in to post a comment.