Your Neighbor Hearts Socialism
by Bret Jacobson… at least that’s what the latest Gallup numbers would suggest: “Socialism Viewed Positively by 36% of Americans”

Ugh.
… at least that’s what the latest Gallup numbers would suggest: “Socialism Viewed Positively by 36% of Americans”

Ugh.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: Gallup poll, socialism
Posted Feb 5th 2010 at 11:59 am in Politics, Tea Party |
70086319 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fbjacobson%2F2010%2F02%2F05%2Fyour-neighbor-hearts-socialism%2FYour+Neighbor+Hearts+Socialism2010-02-05+19%3A59%3A45Bret+Jacobsonhttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D70086
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Vice President Joe Biden met with state and local government officials from across the country last year to provide guidance on spending federal stimulus funds. Biden implored local leaders to focus on only essential infrastructure needs that will put people back to work and to avoid frivolous projects: “No swimming...






319 Comments
I can't believe that poll. 20% of self-identified Conservatives have a positive view of socialism? Did they make these numbers up or did they only poll ultra-liberal areas?
http://factsarestubbornthings.net
These liberals that favor socialism should just be herded up put on a boat and taken to see Hugo.
The poll is likely accurate. The problem is that most people don't know what "socialism" actually means or what the history is. This is why we need to start educating ourselves, our children and others in order to save our country. Your children sure are not going to learn about the true meaning of freedom in school.
I think that when many people hear "Socialism" these day they think about Western Europe and its Socialist Parties. This is hardly Castroism.
Liberals make up the smallest percentage of Americans and the rest of Americans don't like Socialism, so why do these Socialist Liberals keep trying to cram this stuff down our throats? November election…HERE WE COME!
Well over 40% of the population do not pay taxes; why shouldn't they think socialism is a good thing?
The most disturbing part of this poll is the 20% favorable view among conservatives. How can you call yourself a conservative and have a favorable view of socialism? That makes no sense.
Simple solution?
If you don't pay taxes you don't vote.
If you are on welfare or another government handout then you don't vote.
This stops people from voting themselves money.
1 out of 5 'conservatives' view socialism favorably? we're f___ed…
36% of American's favor socialism?!
Good God! Are they insane! Really do these people read history?! The only thing worse than socialism is down right communism! Jeez it feels like my head is gonna explode. I'm gonna go take an aspirin.
But still! Really?!?! I knew part of this country is brain dead, heck a little more than half voted for Obama, but 36 percent?!
Okay I'm coming down from my shock but I gotta tell ya, this is one way I do NOT want to start a morning.
That's right. The poor and the rich don't have to pay taxes. It's us, what's left of the middle class in this country that pay for all of it.
Socialism = entitlement/re-distribution
You can't make a poor man rich by making a rich man poor.
The "Welfare Lobbyists"…there are millions of them!!!
58% of those polled don't favor it. What's the big deal? That's still a majority.
Perhaps a better poll would be to ask them to define socialism. That's always fun.
Scary stuff.
The only reason a person would support socialism is that you cant compete in the free market, they should call socialism the Losers Party. Plus I'd bet the supporters of socialism have no idea what socialism is.
It was on "The Man Show" and they sent out a boy scout to collect those signatures to end women's suffrage. Classic bit and hilarious. Only one woman started yelling at him, the rest signed right up. Hilarious!!!!
I can't imagine that this is a suprise to anyone who went to public ( or some private east and west coast ) schools or have had kids in them. There has been a co-ordinated effort over the last 25 years to paint socialism in a positive light. The efforts of the progressives are now being realized. We need to start pushing back and reclaiming our schools. If this is left alone for even one more generation you are going to see the results of a poll like this being over fifty percent. That fifty percent will be able to vote! Where will we be then?
I doubt over a third of our country has a favorable opinion of Socialism. More likely, about 15-20% (mainly far left liberals) see it as a good thing and the remaining 16% don't understand what Socialism truly means. The fact that any person that would classify themselves as conservative has a positive view of Socialism invalidates the seriousness of this survey. This survey would be more interesting if they asked those with positive feelings toward Socialism to name a prominent leader in a Socialist movement, disqualifying opinions by those that couldn't answer.
It is incredibly ironic that those whose ancestors were most affected by slavery now want everyone to be shackled and toil away on the Democrat Plantation.
I'm sorry, but if you are socialist…what the hell are you doing trying to change America?? Move to any of the already socialist countries. Lets start a fund for airfare for all of these socialists and ship them out. America is not based on Socialism, its based on Capitalistic Republican Democracy. If you don't like it, move, don't "fundamentally transform America".
Considering that's the very path that leads down the Road to Serfdom, it ain't exactly comforting, either.
I blame the propaganda from our state-run education system.
When are you morons going to realize there are no absolutes in life?
Some socialist policies work extremely well.
The national parks. The rights to access the use our lakes, rivers, and beaches.
And I suppose the republican Teddy Roosevelt was a socialist because of the national parks. How about it teabaggers, would Teddy be welcome in today's tea bag party?
God you people are stupid.
example of socialism
Venezuela had beautiful parks. Hugo got rid of the user fee. Results: No money to maintain the parks and now they are all overrun with weeds and falling apart.
The big deal is that the number can always get bigger. If that many can believe it this soon after the Cold War, 51% very well could one day in the not-so-distant future.
I am reminded of the Oprah visit to Denmark: <a>http://www.oprah.com/world/Oprah-Tours-a-Typical-...
This is what a 50% tax rate looks like. This is socialism.
The above posts make a good point – anyone thinking positive about socialism isn't thinking about how would it work here. You can compare Venezuela and Norway for a good comparison on how an idea can and can't work. I don't think socialism would work here – the government's useless as it is!
The Glenn Beck-ers want to go back to the founding fathers….the only people who could vote were white property owning males. Sounds like you would enjoy going back to that!
thanks to the current youth — the lost generation of public school educated americans — brainwashed by teacher unions, Sal Alinsky marxists community organizing tactics — e.g., Che, Mao, Marx et al…………..and then further reinforced by our Colleges and Universities all across USA……how did we let this happen???? Oh, I forgot…..we were all working extra long hours to make enough money to put our kids in the best schools…never knowing we were sending them to Marxist boot camps (public schools) every day. Shame on us, now we have to fight the system to stop this madness…………………take back our freedom.
"Results: No money to maintain the parks and now they are all overrun with weeds and falling apart."
God you people are stupid.
What do suppose those parks were like in centuries past? Could it be they had weeds growing in them and were falling apart? Kinda like nature works?
Every time I think I've seen top stupid for the day someone tops it.
This simply reinforces what we already discovered when Barack Obama was elected. A majority of Americans are clueless when it comes to politics. Much of this may have to do with the fact that our schools are teaching less and less about these subjects. Classes like "civics" are becoming a thing of the past and so having so little knowledge of the political processes and systems the younger generations are far more naive and easily dis-informed.
Perhaps if our educational system were as "comprehensive" as some of the bills our "representatives" try and force on us, the voters would considerably more discerning and free thinking.
It's all a matter of how you phrase the question.
If asked thusly:
How do you feel about living in a workers' paradise where your every need is met, there a chicken in every pot, pot in every bong, and kittens poop rainbows while riding unicorns?"
You are likely to get a fairly enthusiastic response, especially if the sample pool is Berkeley.
If however, it is phrased thus:
What do you think of the government treating you like a slave for half the year, if not more, your health care choices are made for you by bureaucrats, and no matter how far you run, drive, or fly, you are always in the middle of Milwaukee?
The reaction would be decidedly different.
…
Unless the sample pool is Berkeley.
Well there are lot of different reasons people identify themselves as conservative. Not everyone associates conservatism with free markets first and foremost. For the more religiously based, it might make sense. Socialism has always found a degree of sympathy from Christian philosophers.
Nooooooooooooooooooooo………………….it's that they are stupid and have NO idea what Socialism means. They don't even know that many European countries are Socialistic.
I would love to see the same graphs used to show donations to charity.
Correct, sensible99 !
The dumbing down of the American populace has been accomplished; for the most part. There has never been such a huge number of our populace this incredibly ignorant and yes, stupid.
Not to correct someone as smart as you, but Teddy was a progressive RINO. His policies, while not all bad, were mostly socialist. He is the one that started us down the path to socialism. Do I agree with national parks, nope, its not in the Constitution. Do I believe in state parks, absolutely. Read the Constitution and then you'll know that there is no room for socialism in the federal government.
Exactly right!
You can thank the the Left's iron-like grip of the public school systems for the out come of this poll.
Would that include those on Social Security?
Ponder a bit, before you answer that question, but here's a hint to steer you in the right direction…………most people over the age of 65 know what Socialism is and don't like it.
i think those are the rino's who are being smoked out. now i know there are more than 20% rino's, but some may have figured it out, and could lie.
The rich pay taxes, you moron!
Sure, some pay less taxes than you think they should; however, it all depends on just WHO you want to call "rich". Obama and Biden believe that "rich" starts at those earning, depending on which speech they're reading, $150,00, or $200,000, or even $250,000 a year. That's NOT "rich" and it isn't even UPPER MIDDLE CLASS.
The top 10% of tax payers ( which includes those making about $200,000 a year, which includes bank interest, BTW ) pay most of the taxes.
How bout an Island 1mile in diameter, and if we're lucky,
they'll sink!!
.
If democrats could stay in school and out of jail, they wouldn't need so much free stuff from the government.
Greedy people are the ones who sit on the couch smoking dope waiting for the government check to arrive.
.
is this an immigrant poll?
The sad fact is that there are a whole LOT of illeducated stupid out there. They don't know any history, political terminology is completely out of anything they know, let alone understand, and they just don't pay any attention to the news.
the problem with socialism: eventually you run out of other peoples money
A question I would like to see added to this poll.
Do you have a favorable impression with Socialism if you are NOT one of those in charge?
I think most of those with a favorable view of socialism are assuming that they will be in the "more equal than others" part.
Hasn't "philosophy" met "reality" yet?
There's something more going on here, and I suspect it's just plain old ignorance. Maybe when the pollster said "socialism", people heard "socializing".
That effort, in schools, goes back much farther than just one generation, or 25 years.
You're wrong about the best of private east coast schools ( I don't know enough about west coast ones to talk about them ) , many of which still not only teach the Constitution, but also the FEDERALIST PAPERS and the ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS, as well as far more than you know about.
Even MORE important than trying to get change in schools, parents need to stop abrogating their jobs and teach their children what's what !
Great post, Spanky2; you nailed it !
That would make it a better poll, I agree.
Want to see < B>STUPID, harpy ?
GO LOOK INTO THE NEAREST MIRROR !
And your potty mouth posts prove just what an imbecile you are. ;^)
Yes, harpy, every one of your replies is stupid beyond compare!
I think the results of the poll are misleading. If you were to ask that 36% what they think socialism means, I think they might describe social democracy. The constant misuse of the word by certain right wing media goons might have something to do with it.
Without personal attacks, tell me how what they set up is wrong. Also, please identify a BETTER basis for a system of government.
From 35 to 45% of what we earn is taken by some form of government in some form of tax.
I'm sorry, what did you say socialism is?
Bob:
I think Haiti is in need of new leadership…perhaps we could round up all 62 million Libs who voted for the "One" and their childen, give them a one way ticket, never permit re-entry to the USA and, Ba-Da-Boom Ba-Da-Bing!
Those poor folks down there need some help and are quite used to the "nanny state"
Robert, go back to MEDIAMATTERS…………….or are you from KosKids or HuffPo?
You're right about it going farther back than 25 years. And I wasn't lumping in all prive schools, just some. Just like there are still a few public schools that teach responsibly. Luckily here in the South they are still around but are becoming fewer and fewer.
"Results are based on telephone interviews with 972 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted Jan. 26-27, 2010."
They still didn't say enough about the sample, it didn't say it was a "random" sample of people called on landlines or cell phones. I thought that was kind of odd. They could have called people who were members of some American socialist party for all I know, or called on area codes known to have high union memberships, democrats, left leaning college towns, etc.. bleh, I don't believe that many people would have a favorable opinion of socialism based on this unknown sample gathering. I think the pollsters would like us to believe socialism is gaining positive favor. Don't buy it…
Could, but don't currently. I guess I'm a uh…. cup is half full person? (I think that's how that idiom goes.)
Bret:
did the Gallup poll ask those who were polled if they possessed a deep and clear understanding of Socialism?
There ARE absolutes in life, jharp.
There's "absolute zero", for instance; the temperature at which molecular motion stops.
There's "absolute stupidity"; this is often demonstrated here by folks like yourself who manage the saturation of a comment with name-calling, non-sequiturs and factual errors made while completely missing the point of an article.
Go back to the basement and stop teabagging your dog.
So, you feel that Socialists should all live in caves and make fires with two sticks.
Go run with that, stupid.
Agreed. Any time I bring up the absolute failure of every socialist and communist government, I only get reassured that "they weren't doing it right". Of course they weren't doing it right. The only way to get socialism right is to not be human.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVsr-_-v2sI
The only way to save our republic is to replace congress!!!!
No one cares what you think something might mean in your fantasy land brain. It's a poll. There are numbers. they asked a question and got some answers. End of story.
.
Teddy would be appalled.
He'd shoot the ignorant commies who told him he'd now have to give the parks and mineral rights to the Chinese or everyone would have to spend the rest of their life working for the government to pay a national debt of 14 Trillion dollars.
.
Apparently not.
"How about it teabaggers, would Teddy be welcome in today's tea bag party?"
Probably not seeing that Theodor Roosevelt was a Progressive.
K-O!!!
Good schools are disappearing in the South, as fast as they are everywhere else.
Did you see what they want to do in one of the Carolinas? Sorry I forget which one, I didn't pay attention to whether it was North or South. Instead of teaching American history, from the beginning, in 9th grade, they want to begin it in 1877…………….1877, for crying out loud!
Thomas Dewey was behind pushing Socialism, as well as such crackpot notions as doing away withe bothering to teach penmanship, because he claimed that everyone word be using typewriters, of all things and THAT was more then 100 years ago.
I think most people when they think about socialism are thinking of a democratic welfare state – like many of the countries of western europe – and frankly – that is not too bad. In real life social democracy – there is an ongoing tension and interplay between market forces, social forces, and government forces. For a time – social forces, including labor, hold sway. Later, market forces assert themselves effecting how the the economy and the state are organized. It is very interactive and plauristic. And it is not what the simplistic vision of libertarians would have you believe.
I beg to differ. There may be absolute zero, and something like the speed of light may also be absolute, but there is probably no absolute stupidity.
Just when you think jharp has reached the pinacle of his abusiveness and idiocy, he'll find a way to surpass previous behavior.
You're right – most people have no idea of what "socialism" means. They probably don't have any idea what "communism" means either, except to say "I thought that went away when the Berlin Wall fell."
Really, this reminds me of those interviews (similar to another post) that Jay Leno used to do where he had someone ask random people on the street if they knew the name of the vice president. As I remember, even when these people were fed the name and given all kinds of hints, they still couldn't pinpoint it. So this doesn't surprise me at all. We have a hell of a mountain to climb, though, in terms of education, to get people to realize what it really means.
Keep making posts dude. It's just you give such a fine example that the stupidity of pro-Socialists is beyond reproach.
I'm not a "libertarian", know exactly what Socialism is, and you're an idiot; not to mention damned dead wrong, on all counts.
Socialism, in any form, doesn't work, is detrimental to every section of society, removes initiative, and isn't anything any American should perceive as benign.
Ladies and gentlemen, the first strawman of the thread.
The article said, "Respondents were not given explanations or descriptions of the terms."
I am in favor of democracy. And democracy is an evolving concept. First – just white males with property – then – all white males – then – all males – and then finally – all people. And at each step we have had to fight for increased rights. 1776 does not totally encompass the founders of the American democracy. These founders also include Fredrick Douglas, the Abolitionist and Martin Luther King. And my founders include Susan B. Anthony – the feminist and leader of the effort for women's vote. And my founders include Walter Reuther and the hundreds and thousands of leaders who founded the labor movement and gave working people a fair shake. And I am for the expansion of democracy to include economic democracy as well as political democracy. It is part of the expansion and evolution of democracy. Something our founding fathers in 1776 never contemplated and never could have contemplated.
Sure, Teddy R. would be invited to a Tea Party (your faulty nomenclature is supposed to be cute, right?). Even Teddy K. would be invited to a Tea Party. Would they show up? Doubtful, as they're Lib and Liberaler.
Teddy R. was indeed a big government RINO. That said, he was also a tough cuss who wasn't afraid of guns, fisticuffs, and dealing correctly with terrorists: "Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!"
There have been red blooded Americans who have believed what I believe since the beginning our country. If you don't realize that – you are not looking around.
How much you wanna bet that most of the 36% of the pro-Socialists are in the 18-25 age range.
Because if it is my generation is so screwed!
I don't think my last comment posted, if it did I apologize in advance for the double post. The article said, "Respondents were not given explanations or descriptions of the terms."
that 20% needs to be put in the Dem/Lib/Prog pile, assuming it is based on self-identification, they've self-identified themselves out of being conservative.
It's not too bad until the birth rate drops so low that you have to import unassimilated Muslims from places like Algeria and Turkey to fill in the work force and wake up one day to find your country has disappeared and you're basically a stranger in your homeland.
It's not too bad until you have a permanent 10 percent unemployment rate because your population would rather sit around on the dole than take an entry-level job.
It's not too bad until your entrepreneurs are the first ones who emigrate because they believe they can make a lot more money starting a business in Dubai or Hong Kong or Costa Rica.
Western Europe is absolutely the wrong model. We're probably better off being Venezuela – at least if you're Venezuela the people get fed up and have a revolution in relatively short order. Western Europe is more like a slow death.
No, it PREDATES the beginning of this nation and was not just found wanting, b ut horrod and abolished.
The Mass. Bay colony tried out collectivism and it failed, failed badly; as it ALWAYS does. Some people did as littl;e as possible, while others worked as hard as they could and the outcome was equally divided. Those who had worked hard were furious and rebelled. This little experience was then stopped and everyone went back to the way things REALLY work and that was the end of that !
Obviously you don't know much history at all !
You believe CRAP, so why should anyone believe a single thing you post, when it's all utter garbage?
Are you even an American citizen?
Socialism, of any stripe, is NOT freedom; it is SLAVERY.
tell him that's what goes to the "Obama stash."
So 36% have a postivie view of socialism, thats only a third. Where's the beef? I mean, 42% of Republicans think Obama was not born in America. Its easy to see who sits on the throne of idiocy in this country. And besides, the right has done well in defining Obama as a socialist, so if one has a positive view of Obama is it not natural to also have a postive view of socialism? Unintended consequences.
Ask them if they like Hitler or Stalin or any of the other Socialists / Dictators / Marxist and then ask them the question!
You're blaming the wrong propaganda.
But take your low hanging fruit, good right wing lemming.
I really distrust Gallup as a reliable pollster and have for several years. They never really disclose how the questions are framed to those being polled. In this case they didn't seem to do a random sample or disclose how they chose their sample upfront. They said national sample, but what states and cities did they call? How many from each of these locations? They can easily skew the results to make something look like a popular trend if they choose to, all they have to do then is get the dis-info passed into the media. Few people question how these surveys are conducted or hold them accountable for honesty. The media just passes it off as valid without question. I suspect your generation is going to be ok.
If your generations is not ok then we are all screwed. I was born at the end of the baby boom generation, do you know how tired I have been steppin in the poop some of those asshats have left for the rest of us?
Excellent point. Given Obama's approval about 48% that puts about 12% between positive socialism view and O approval. Easily within margin of error to match your numbers.
Honestly, the right has ruined the definition of socialism by using it so viruently as an attack word on anything the government is involved with.
Maybe you're right. I may have wanted to use "consistent" instead of "absolute". I think I could still say that jharp's comments are absolutely, consistently stupid, but maybe it is more proper to say that they are consistently absolutely stupid?
I wish Wm F Buckley were around to be asked.
Oh man I could only imagine. I was born, well more like conceived after my dad came home from Desert Storm. So I was a newborn for the last seven months of Bush Sr 's administration so the first President I really remember was Clinton. *shudders*
I do remember cheering for Bush Jr. during the 2000 election, mostly cause my parents told me he was the good guy. But by 2004 I well much more well versed in the issues of the election then. The economy was really a back-seat issue for me since I was far more interested in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (being from a military family and all).
Today I've seemed to have made a total 180 on the priority of issues. But at least I gotten the best of both worlds when it comes to issue. Militarily back then and currently Economic. It's not to say that I don't care about Afghanistan and Iraq. I do remember screaming at the T.V. when Obama was taking so long to decide to put forces into Afghanistan. To me that's a 'no-brainier' decision, give them what they need NOW! But I digress.
Right now its the economy and we definitely do NOT need socialism!
Hoping to bang a hippy chick probably.
Forget the liberals; what I want to know is, who are these 20% of "conservatives" that view socialism positively?!
Yeah, like Alger Hiss, Julius Rosenberg, Tom Hayden…wait a minute…
The "rich" pay 90% of the taxes to the Feds. The "middle class" pays the other 10%. The "poor", if you want to call a family with only 1, instead of 2 flat screen tv's, but also having at least 1 car and a place to live, "poor", are paying "0%". At least you got half of it right.
Your reasoning that a Public Park is by definition socialism is a canard.
A police department is not socialism. A Government building is not socialism. A road is not socialism.
All of these things existed in Ancient Greece. In Monarchies. And in Totalitarian states.
I am hoping that by the time the "O" is done, that number currently favoring socialism will fall back a few notches. If that does not happen, we're in for a major sh!t$torm.
Is it the policies the the president is trying to enact or the social policies already enacted that are the problem.
I am sure there are quite a few socialist policies you people are happy to have.
1. government regulation of utilities. unless you would be happier with your power and water provider being able to raise their rates whenever they saw fit to do so.
2. social security. i am sure there are quite a few on here that know someone on social security. would you be ok with it being taken away?
3. OSHA. Who needs work place safety.
4. The FCC. I personally could do with out this one. i can monitor what my kids watch on tv. i dont need the government to decide what is and what isn't appropriate.
5. Labor unions and minimum wage rates. Should employers be able to pay as little wage as they want?
6 cancellation of Third World debt. (not a policy but something the socialist party would like to see happen)
7. federal investment in both urban and rural development. this would include baseball parks, basketball stadiums, recreational parks.
No–there is an interplay, but it's between those who are desperately trying to keep the welfare state from collapsing under its own weight and those who have become so addicted to the handouts from said state that they just don't care about the costs.
Europe is a statist continent. Practically no political party of any stripe will suggest–or dare to suggest–that a free-market, laissez-faire economy should be adopted. That view is entirely shut out, making it a much less interactive place than you seem to believe it is.
Many of these things exist in America today because of the long term organizing and influence of progressives and socialists (not the same thing by the way).
Conservatives—-A LOT
Liberals————A LITTLE
OK Jharp you win
Thank you Carl for Yellow Stone Park, but please NO Gorky Park for us.
Liberals.
Well, Bookman, I hate to break it to you, but if they WEREN'T ALIVE during the founding of the nation it is a foolish anachronism to call them founders.
Also, YOU are the one who sounds like the racist here. Seems like you're implying that blacks are incapable of living without the help of Big Brother. It's really no surprise, this insidious form of racism has always been just under the surface of the progressive movement.
Me thinks you are on to something there JB.
In my experience I have come to the conclusion that equality only works in algebra
If you need an example, I give you Stalin.
I believe it's mostly liberals falsely claiming to be conservative to skew results. They are always trying to convince us we're a dying breed.
You mean like just walk over to the horse, open his mouth and count his teeth.
But than what do we do with Robert's philosophy degree.
I spouted that crap too, in my twenties. Glad I got my head on right, eventually.
My guess if Bookman is a young person, he/she was probrably
not taught much history, and if he/she was taught history, it was
skewed, and not factual……..
I bet you don't even watch his show. So what's your point?
Socialism is also an evolving concept, and unfortunately, it evolves into the oppression of and mass murders of human beings.
That's NORTH Carolina. The reported rationale is that would leave more time to concentrate on "current" issues (apparently such as global climate change). The problem, in my opinion, is that these 2nd generation educators are sincere. The ball is in our court. My answer is to to bring control of schools back to the local level (clearly even state ed depts are not reliable). The price for this change is to devote the time to GET INVOLVED in your child's education!
Oh, well, gee Bookman, since in "Bookman's Playhiuse" we get to invent our own Founders instead of seeing what HISTORICAL FACT says about who the Founders ACTUALLY WERE, then MY "Founders" are going to be the original REAL Founders, enhanced to include this totally awesome lineup:
Glenn Beck
Mr. T (who pities you, fool!)
Christopher Walke
Jesus
Wayne Gretsky and Ray "Boom Boom" Mancini
Sarah Palin
Todd Beamer
Seriously, though- substituting history with your own version of "reality" is totally weak and makes you SUCH a douchebag.
Don't know if it is true, but I heard there's something in the current budget that would eliminate the charitable deduction starting next year – and limit the mortgage deduction more than it already is. Anyone know if true and a source?
Occam's Razor. There ya go. It's always about bagging the chix.
Like ruining health care for 300 million so 30 million can get (crappy) coverage.
Sure, ask a group of socialists if they like socialism and what types of numbers do you think you'll come up with?
I would say, then, that the 36% of Americans who 'heart' socialism should relocate SOON to a socialist country. And we'll help them pack and move them for free ONLY if they promise not to return. Deal?
And this is how Obama tried to get this 'healthcare' bill passed–by polls 'indicating' that vast numbers of Americans favored it.
Doesn't this clown and his administration (of thugs) even have the imagination to change strategies??
My guess is that Bookie isn't an American at all, but if he/she is one, he/she is stupid; not just ignorant.
And yes, that poster has to be very young; though he/she could also be a case of atrrested development. ;^)
There are problems all over the EU and it's isn't of recent making, but has been an ongoing mess for quite some time.
proposal at this point
see: http://bigjournalism.com/bmccarty/2010/02/02/did-...
Have not heard anything but it sure sounds anti individual. so it is probably on Pelosi's schedule.
You're a female, right Bookie?
You're also rather young and badly educated.
Red Diaper baby, are ya, or were your parents just brain dead hippies?
You lack adequate punctuation skills, so one of your sentences makes no sense at all and your "understanding" and usage of the word "democracy" makes you look worse than foolish.
Oh, so now YOU are "smarter" than the FFs, are you? Not in this universe, you bleeding moron !
I bet that you believe that the Constitution needs to continually be "fixed" don't you; that it gets out of date and only you and your ilk can "fix" it all. LOL
They need to re-do this survey. It would be simple …tax paying citizens for socialism vs. non-tax paying citizens for socialism ?
Thanks, I thought that it was North Carolina, but didn't want to post that and look the fool, should my memory have crashed.
Yes, I know what they claimed; however, that claim is patently ridiculous and, as you stated, it IS only to get more control and be able to brainwash the kiddies even more, with lies and propaganda.
Yes…………………………………..and my neighbors are idiots………………………………….and voted for noblama as well.
Now, you may not agree with my view of history but I think I could challenge you to a history quiz. The key matter, of course, is not the events but how one interprets them. History is always viewed thru the lens of who you are rooting for. I think we are rooting for different people. I root for the slaves who were brought from Africa. And I root for the Quakers and Abolitionists who opposed slavery. And I root for the people who stopped child labor in this country. And I root for the people who opposed the poor wages and working conditions of industrialism and formed unions. And I root for those who register the unemployed to vote. I think you know in your heart that we root for different people. Perhaps even a different America. But America nonetheless.
Just for the record, my family came to this country in 1652 and settled in what at the time was New Amsterdam. And I have two children, 24 and 16. We go to Church. We pay our taxes. But we do not see the world the same way that you do. I read history thru a perspective that you will never understand unless you decide to get to know and stand with some of people of this country who do not have power or influence.
Huh?
Federal involvement in urban and rural development? No, I did not find anywhere in the Constitution the authority for federal investments in those areas. (Even for baseball parks.)
Yes, businesses should be able offer pay rates as low as they want. It is your choice to accept or reject that pay rate.
That pesky Constitution also gives states and NOT the Federal government the authority to set regulations concerning how business is conducted within their states (including safety). And yes I am in favor of workplace safety.
SSI was a mistake. The recipients would have been better off if they put their contributions in a personal retirement plan. The problem is that by establishing programs such as SSI and Medicare we have created an entitlement mentality by the current recipients. Unfortunately those programs are not sustainable. Our only option is to find a way to back out of those mistakes over time (current suggestions to raise SSI eligibility is a start).
Who gave utilities monopoly power?
BTW, interstate regulation of commerce (i.e. make regular) is one of the enumerated powers granted to the federal government and is not "socialism". You can make a good case that a national power grid is under the scope of "regulating interstate commerce".
Excuse me, you obviously don't realize that I was using the concept of "founders" metaphorically. And America is the ultimate metaphor. America is becoming. America is not just what it was in 1776. And America is not just what was written in the Constitution. America is an aspiration for that which is better and more just.
feel a huge wave of enthusiam across this state
we are gonna put an end to this treachery you just watch and wait!
why are you so marxist, why so crude?
i will not trust chairman mao to grow my food!
so forgive me sir if i sound rude!
it is you sith lord obama that made me get in this mood!
Give a man a fish, he has dinner. (socialism)
Teach a man to fish, he can feed himself for the rest of his life. (conservatism)
Challenge away and against me, no matter WHAT views you hold, you hold, you WILL lose ! You've already proved that statement.
I too come from an "old New York City" family, though mine came somewhat later than yours did. And on that note, a contest between you and me, on NYC history, would not be one that you can ever win.
History has always been written by the winners, except lately, when the moronic revisionists have been attempting to teach it not only from the losing side, but LYING about it all.
Being a Howard Zinn acolyte isn't going to work, Bookie; I can and shall shred you so badly, that your bleeding heart unber liberal little brain is going to go "POP".
Most of the Abolistionist were………*gasp* first Whigs and then REPUBLICANS……………….it's WHY the GOP was started.
FYI……………….it was BLACK Africans who captured other blacks, used them as their own slaves and sold them to European and Arab slave traders, when Europeans hadn't had slaves for centuries. Yet, I don't see YOU condemning them.
The original fomenters and propagandists for labor unions were………………ANARCHISTS !
Most of those who came slightly to decades later, were SOCIALISTS/ MARXISTS and the ones who tried to unionize Hollywood were card carrying stinking COMMIES !
You're for Amerika, whilst I'm for AMERICA!
Oh big whoop…………you pay your taxes ( all of them, or do you cheat? ) and go to church. Well, la dee da…………………….. is that supposed to impress me? LOL
Do you assume that I and those with whom you disagree don't do either?
Lots of blacks hold power, today,
There were many black millionaires in the 19th century, all over this nation, the vast majority of whom went to Ivy League colleges and universities, WITHOUT ANY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, earned excellent grades, WITHOUT GRADE INFLATION, whose children and grandchildren and great grandchildren went to the likes of Spence, Chicago's Latin School and even to elite boarding schools, as well as to Ivy colleges and universities.
I personally know of elite boarding schools who take lots of American Indians and have done so for a very long time.
Dartmouth was set up to educate American Indians and several other Ivy League colleges ( Harvard is another ) took American Indians, from their beginnings.
You don't "understand" a damned thing and therefore, it is impossible for you to
"read history" through the downtroddens' eyes, or whatever the bloody hell you are attempting to claim. And your "perspective" is that of a dummy, trying to "feel good" about yourself, whilst looking down your nose at everyone else; hubristically .
He's from MediaMatters. Smell the lotion?
He wipe his bum with it and sing him to sleep.
My MM meter went off…………………………LOL
Great solution, I like it!
Is your Magic Progressive De-Coder Thesaurus for sale?! I think I need one to help make sense of those who double speak with all their so called brilliant observations. Economic democracy…let me guess – Redistribution of Wealth.
I think you hit right on the head1Red….this person has that notion that our Constitution does not fit todays America. It stands to reason then that the Bible doesn't fit todays world I guess.
Bookie sounds like an up and coming Community Organizer – aka Acorn personality….
Bookie……………….you didn;'t answer any of my question, so I'll ask you again:
ARE YOU A RED DIAPER BABY?
ARE YOUR PARENTS OLD HIPPIES ?
ARE YOU A FEMALE?
Nary a one of theses queries are precluded by what you claim your ancestry is, nor your church going.
One more question…………………….are you married, separated, or divorced ? And yes, that question IS relevant !
The rich don't have to pay taxes? Really? Here in America?! Wow, that's news to me.
Actually folks should learn what a "Progressive" is to start with I have started educating in another forum. If you are interested.
Cup half full is a good place to be, in your personal life. To me, it's that attitude of "I'm not too concerned about this" that led this country to the state it is in now – too many were too complacent. We are NOT too big to fail.
Not trying to pick on you Mago, just giving my opinion.
There go the liberals, yet again
Amen ~
Thanks, OCG !
That poster is an elitist snob, who is uneducated, no matter where he/she went to school !
Anyone can type any damned thing about themselves, on line, so we all need to take personal revel,ations, such as the ones Bookie made, with a grain of salt.
OTOH, yes, the Constitution, the Bible, and probably a whole lot else, are mutable, as far Bookie is concerned. The fact is, they really aren't ! Oh, the Constitution is ammendable, just NOT shredable.
Here's a couple more 'absolutes'
We all absolutely die one day
We absolutely must use our brain, or it will die
We must exercise our right to freedom, or it will die
Why I even respond to such dribble is a mystery – harp is a silly little kid
In 1856 or 1860 I would have been a Republican. Republicans were the progressive party then. The Democrats supported slavery. The leaders of the Abolitionist movement were Republicans. And most African Americans were Republicans until the Great Depression. And they have been 95% Democratic ever since.
You are right, I would recommend, "A People's History of the United States" by Howard Zinn. And I would also recommend, "Labor's Untold Story".
ANSWERS:
1. NO
2. NO
3. NO
4. MARRIED
Words, terms, and phrases have set definitions; you can't change them on a whim, Bookie, to any old thing of YOUR choosing!
The term "FOUNDING FATHERS" applies only to the men who were personally involved in the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION in Philly, with writing the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence and with our earliest government. You can't use that term in any other way, nor even stretching it to be a "metaphor".
Neither is "AMERICA" a "metaphor"; it's a nation.
No, America isn't what it was in 1776; it wasn't a sovereign nation, yet, in 1776…….. you mordant idiot !
And YOU want to have a contest with me, with the topic being HISTORY ?
REALLY ?
Are you enjoying being publicly humiliated ?
Sue whatever schools you've ever gone to………………….you don't know what the average fifth grade New Yorker used to taught !
"America is not what was written in the Constitution. "
HUNH?
Our Constitution is a bio of America, a diary, a factual treatise on what America was like when it was written and not a code which lays out the rights of the people and states, as well as what governmental rules ?
"America is an aspiration……………………." ?
Come on, fess up, you're really a 13 year old snot nosed kid, pretending to be an adult.
Thanks !
I had become aware of this in the past and it's in line with all BO's other dumb and America destroying agendas. Charities are already hurting so of course in BO's world it makes perfect sense to place many of them in even greater peril. I honestly just can't understand this one, it's so illogical, unless you have a deep disdain for anyone who has money and places some in a charitable fund – which people then view as yet another 'loop hole' for the rich – when in fact, it's a vehicle to keep some of their money vs. being taxed to death, and then having the ability to donate to the causes they feel are in need. I won't even attempt to give an opinion of the mortgage deduction fiasco -
I agree, we need to change what our children are being taught in schools these days. Of course my children are grown and having their own but I try to make sure my grandchildren are being taught the right things.
Oh I agree there. It's just with the headline and then a majority percentage of the poll disliking socialism…. I take that in a positive light. Especially when you consider how polls often mean nothing.
Oh Bookie……………the GOP started in 1854; still want that history contest, against me? ;^)
Blacks were still a force in the GOP when Nixon was nominated their presidential candidate in 1960. The person who seconded his nomination, Jewel Stradford Lafontant, an highly well educated black woman from…………………………………Chicago, wasn't the only black GOPer, back then, nor were 95% in Dem lockstep then, nor in the 1930s. That took a while; Bookie.
Of course you would recommend that idiot Zinn's book; it's a crock and you are a moron !
You want to waste time on book lists? How about I drop a few 100 books that you really should read ?
The Democrats STILL support slavery, sweetums…………wake up and smell the coffee !
Goodnight all. It has been fun (and I did enjoy it). Some of the posters on this blog need to chill.
"God you people are stupid"
No, no, NOOOO! That's not how to be a troll! You're using mundane insults!
You're supposed to use CREATIVE name calling! Goodness… What does it take to get a decent troll these days????
You're NOT a female?
If you aren't lying, you are THE most unmanly male poster, I have EVER seen, on line, in 14 years and I'/ve seen some doozies!
Thanks for the answer, but they're pretty hard to believe, given what you have posted.
Do you live in Manhattan ?
Add to the list Unions – no I am not happy or thankful for the on-going growth and power of unions
Don't come back, Bookie and it's YOU who need to "chill"; kid.
You also need to study factual history and give up believing the crapola that Zinn peddled.
And "the sun" is a metaphor for things I like that are warm, like toast, or a cat.
Yes, America changes, but it's PROMISE should remain the same:
Liberty. Freedom. Self-sufficiency. Ingenuity. Honor.
The Constitution makes America "America".
As for "more just", I'm afraid to know what YOU consider to be "more just".
"Liberals make up the smallest percentage of Americans and the rest of Americans don't like Socialism,"
If you honestly believe this then you must think the average conservative American is the laziest SOB on the planet. That's the only explanation for not getting to the polls, right. If WE outnumber THEM, how else do you explain the election results?
The guy is a troll, plain and simple. Arianna Huff -N-Puff sent his Commie butt over here to stir the pot. Pay no mind to the no-minded.
If the rich don't pay taxes, explain to me why they are basing their business overseas along with our jobs to avoid punitive corporate taxes. I'll wait….
There's also a HUGE difference between CHARITABLE giving and being FORCED to "contribute"!
isnt there an island the size of Australia or something we could send them to, have them start over the way they see fit, the funny thing is they will figure out there is no working class to take care of them, and the whole thing will fall apart. LOL
How many responders even know what socialism actually means? poll is meaningless because of this unknown variable.
And the truth comes out: Republicans are actually more conservative than Conservatives! Go figure! Or is it just that Republicans are smarter or better educated? Hmmm. I'll have to think about that one for a while.
Really, what this tells me is that proglibs have infiltrated every walk of life in this country. No matter how you want to "group" yourselves, you've probably got one sitting next to you anyway. Think about that the next time you are staring at your spouse across the dinner table!
Sure he's a troll, but whether he will ever admit it or not, I shredded him and humiliated him, with both hands tied behind by back and with knowledge I acquired in the fifth grade. LOL
By Jove! I think he's got it! Yes, the elitist proglibs see everyone as a bunch of losers to be used for their personal benefit! Hellloooo!
Ugh for sure. It's amazing how many people are in favor of an idea until they realize what the ramifications are for following through on the idea. I would guess that 1/2 the people in favor have no clue what the negatives are, their liberal bleeding hearts just want things to be "fair".
After we got our paycheck stubs today, a gentleman that sits in a cubicle across from me at work today went into a tirade about how much of his tax money gets taken away. So you have a clear picture, he's black and had a newspaper picture of Obama winning his election hanging in his cubicle for several months after he was elected. He's smart, raises a family, and makes a decent living.
He was so upset and fully voiced his extremely negative opinion about how so much is taken out and, even worse, that none of it really goes where the govt. says it's going to go. He said "I never get anything! I never see a penny of this!"
A group of…lets say "non Obama voters" that make up all the rest of us on the team at work were all sitting around him. He said "I never get anything! I never see a penny of this! Where the hell does it all go?" And I kinda laughed and said "to other people obviously" and the rest of us slapped ourselves in our foreheads and wondered how many more regular hard working people voted for Obama not having a clue what they were really voting for.
Helping other people really does go to the heart of what America is, but there is such a huge difference between giving someone "a hand up" and "a handout". It's truly sad that so many on the left are content holding eachother down. And they think we're the bad guys…
Simple solution?
If you don't pay taxes you don't vote.
If you are on welfare or another government handout then you don't vote.
This stops people from voting themselves money.
How does this invalidate anything? These people are pulling handles at the voting booths all across America. That's as "valid" as you could ever ask for! The fact that they seem confused to you does not prevent them from voting.
Actually, John, the 20% of conservatives that have a favorable view of socialism should be shipped out to Hugo.
The ultimate goal of Socialism/Communism is to become the dominant philosophy on the planet. You gotta break a lot of eggs to make that omelet. Why did you think we were in Vietnam? Oil?
Obama is a progressive, he feels it is the state that should provide for all needs of the citizens. The goal, the end game, is to have an electorate become increasingly dependent on the state. Private organizations are a hindrance to that goal. The more needs met to by a private charity or non-governmental volunteers, the less reliance on the state. It is a means to shift money from private to government hands, and then government is more in control of determining where that money goes. Big Brother.
What these faithless progressives do not understand is that good people give from their heart, not because of tax credits.
Go watch some more cartoons, moron. They might improve your IQ.
Kruschev told us that was how they were going to do it. I guess Joe McCarthy ain't looking so stupid and paranoid now, is he?
"When are you morons going to realize there are no absolutes in life? "
Don't look now, dumb ass, but you just uttered an Empirical statement. Way to make a fool of yourself in a single sentence!
I concur. There are a lot of people uneducated about what socialism actually is. It reminds me of a comedy bit – I think it was on Leno – where a guy roamed the streets collecting signatures from women to end "Women's Suffrage" and damn if 9 out of 10 women didn't sign the thing. If people can stop watching American Idol and concern themselves more with history, I think we would all be better off.
"the government's useless as it is! "
That's because we are well down the road to full blown Socialism. This is what it looks like! You're LIVING IT! Take a whiff! It stinks, doesn't it?
So… When exactly did the Federal Government become unconstitutional?
Sometimes you shoot a deer because you need the meat, and sometimes you do it just because you can. Nice shot!
It doesn't matter whether they "understand" it or not. These people are out there VOTING and this is what they're saying. What part of that don't you understand? I think you are in denial.
I know this is hard for you to understand, but some people actually mean what they say and say what they mean. When we say we don't want socialism, that means ANY socialism. Take your programs like Social Security , Welfare and Medicare and SHOVE THEM where the sun don't shine! I don't need a nanny state to take care of me or my family IF I'm allowed to keep what I earn.
The Federal Government's job is to maintain the Interstate transportation system and provide for the common defense. Period. Nothing else. Read the Original Constitution.
By all means, if 36% of people want something, we should go for it!
-makes dick for sense
Scarier still is 20% of conservatives have a favorable view of socialism…which actually makes me doubt the veracity of this poll. What conservative could support socialism?…the very fact that they would means they are NOT conservatives.
I've often wondered who they are polling?! Never have I gotten a call or a form in the mail, asking my opinion on anything! The criteria for any hypothesis to be proven is extensive and I highly doubt any of the polls are even close to meeting the criteria. But yes, I know what you are saying regarding the numbers, one can gain some comfort there are still sane people in this country
So shooting trolls is sport – game on!
I'm not so skilled at it, they annoy the crap out of me much like attempting to have a conversation in person with one who won't stop blabbing long enough to listen.
He lives in his head 1Red….
You are a complete idiot! it does have relevance. The libtards are not educating our fat, lazy youths about AMERICAN history. Think it thru will ya?
You're the idiot, my retarded friend. Morons like you are going to the polls and voting for the wrong people. Think THAT through, jerk!
Aw, did we hit a sore spot. I've an idea; gather up all of your liberal troll friends and the rest of the Dumbocratic scum who voted for Hoax & Chains…. we'll all chip in an buy you a one way ticket to Haiti so you can set up your progressive utopia there. those folks aree used to the nanny state and you pukes will finally feel like you have some self worth. Yea! we're all happy now. But, one last chance for you; try reading American history. Then compare it to the writings of Morons like George Bernard Shaw….
Thanks Looking, it was fun and easy……………for me.
Learn from someone who knows.
Read: Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Warning to the West (Words of Warning to the Western World)
1974
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles7/Solzhenit...
A World Split Apart (especially relevant today)
delivered 8 June 1978, Harvard University http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/alexande...
P.S. your posts don't align with your profile. not very stealth
Give it time, OCG, you'll soon find it easy and fun to do; just relax and keep firing with FACTS !
If you allow a troll to get under your skin, you lose and the damned troll wins and that is something you never want to happen. They come here to disrupt, insult and make us all feel rotten; so turn it on and go for their jugular……any way you can/feel comfortable doing.
Thanks, OCG, but I must admit that I have yet to see a troll here, worth my best efforts. I'm an old troll killer and have seen much better ones on other sites. The ones we get here are amateurs.
He's delusional, that's for sure.
And I meant it, he sounds like a 13 year old.
Sorry, but it sounds like your friend needs to man-up and grow a pair. Yes, the free market is scary. It's filled with frightening things like "competition" and "risk." But our capitalistic society has enabled this country to be the most prosperous nation on earth. It has provided us with the freedom to take risks and be rewarded with success. And it also gives us the freedom to fail in our endeavors and then TRY AGAIN (Thomas Edison once famously said, "I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work"). It has raised people out of poverty, created millionaires out of high school dropouts and has inspired innovation in every field imaginable. Heck, capitalism has even created millionaires out of those who denounce capitalism! A centrally-planned economy where government controls the means of production is a proven failure. Even Lenin and Stalin couldn't make it work. Eliminating the profit incentive and competition doesn't exactly make for a booming economy. Destroying the motivation for individual success certainly doesn't make a nation stronger.
But these are the same people to show up to vote! Just look at this Administration and Congress. It truly represents the will of the voting public. Very sad. Fortunately for us, more and more true conservatives are getting the idea that they need to get off their asses on election day and get to the polls. Let's hope so, anyway. If not, we will soon be living in an Idiocracy
Me, too! Welcome to the group. lol!
This poll just mirrors what we see in almost every election. A significant number of Americans are clueless morons who no nothing about the damage socialism has done to other countries and will do to us if not stopped.
I don't know if you've seen this, but it might help you in your teaching efforts.
http://friendsoftheconstitution.cs2webservices.co...
It's D.L. Cuddy's Chronological History of the New World Order. It lays out the whole Progressive Movement in all it's hideous glory.
Be careful who you call a teabagger. they may just feed you your own teabag.
some of us like working and EARNING what we get.
and are not going to pay for the looters any more.
I think you know in your heart that we root for different people
And therein lies your problem. It's not about rooting for people, it's about rooting for principles.
I think we are rooting for different people. Your smugness is loathsome. I doubt you'll find anyone here who would not be rooting for those people in history you speak of. That's because many of the people rooting for them in the past were Republicans and they did so for reasons of principle.
Now, people like you toss principles aside and it's all about people; that is a sure path to disaster. You will fight racism or inequality with, um, racism and inequality (e.g., affirmative action). You see, it's no longer about principle with people like you and that is dangerous because you will justify all kinds of unprincipled things in the name of rooting for people.
I could give endless examples of how rooting for chosen groups instead of principles leads to destruction, tyranny, etc.
Zinn and his sycophants represent everything that is wrong. Evil would be the correct description.
Yo Bookman – we are a Republic, we are not a democracy – do you know the difference? I've learned something this past year, when you see the word "evolving" we know that means "progressive." Now, what the heck does "economic democracy" mean? I'll have to file that one away in my Magic Progressive De-Coder Thesaurus when I know what it is.
Your problem is reading Howard Zinn. Socialism abolishes the middle class, so you will end up with the ruling class and the "people". Labor's Untold Story is that the workers work and pays dues and the union leaders collect dues and make decisions; ruling class and the "people". No individual voice.
Between the fraud and "OBAMAMANIA" people who wouldn't have ever voted, voted. That's how we got Obama.
There's much more of a "buyers remorse" going on, than was the case with Clinton and look at what happened in '94 ! As bad as he was, and he was plenty bad, Obama almost makes one yearn for Slick Willie.
Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh, was I the ONLY one here who wasn't an idiot in their twenties? LOL
Socialism/Progressivism=Communism/Facism…………..Simple. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Voter apathy and a splintered Conservative electorate? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Come on now! You shooed her/him/it away, and I just got here!
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
It's hilarious that you continue to embarrass yourself over and over with your mind-numbing stupidity.
Listen fool, everyone knows society has to be organized. That you even attempt to talk of the national parks shows (again) that you are utterly ignorant.
God, you are stupid.
Excellent point, Mago. Ask these people to define, and then defend, 'Socialism'. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Good one, Vince!
Obamunism is actually closer to progressivism/facism.Good post! ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Or maybe, you just make them look like amateurs! lol
Spot on, Chidog!
I didn't bother to him him over the head with the fact that "rooting" for someone isn't what one does, when discussing history; it's what one does when watching a sports team play; but that is the case.
You did a great job!
I suppose an article about James O'Keefe or Progressivism? No, wait, that dosen't work either as evidenced a couple of days ago……..Uhhh, let's see. Where have all the decent trolls gone? Maybe there never were any, EVAH!!
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Sorry Hanzo, but it's not my fault you got to the "WHACK THE TROLL" party late. ;^)
So Obama has a 36% approval rating, sounds about right, unintended consequences? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
I agree. My only hope is that these are democrats who call themselves "conservatives". I do believe and hope that some of the other commenters are correct. Most people are woefully uninformed.
Well, that too, but I have yet to see a troll on any of the BIG sites worth a damn. I battle them 1/2 asleep/without any sweat.
And I'm not kidding, most of the facts I use against them, I did learn in the fifth grade ! I had a fantastic teacher, who not only knew her stuff, but demanded that all of her students learn it and really know and understand what she was teaching! Because of her, I can still close my eyes and name every single state, the capitals, major cities and waterways, and what the state is known for. Her history lessons were riveting !
It proves Churchill's axiom.
Obviously there's a big time defect in the troll factory these days. Probably some union dispute….
I suppose so, except that I wasn't "heartless" when I was in my twenties. There are exceptions to every rule and saying.
Thanks for giving us shining examples of government run amuck, schmuk.Your post just confirmed my belief that socialists are stoopid.You cite excellent cases of big government extending its tentacles into every aspect of our lives, enslaving all.Overregulating, overreaching, overruling common sense, overlapping bureaucracy, overacting, overreacting, overburdening productive people, overbearing, overgrowing, overkilling, overpowering, overweening, overstepping and overwhelming, all hallmarks of a socialist/communist/progressive/facist government, whose time up is long overdue.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
No, his parents teach him to take care of himself, as they raise him in a loving, nurturing family environment.
True Conservatism. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
True dat, bookie is epic fail, PWN3D fo' sho', bro'!! ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
They tried in the late 1700's. Been downhill since then.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
I never actually believed it, I just liked playing the devil's advocate. I voted for Reagan twice in my twenties.
Thanks, Hanzo !
Hey, where ya been? I've missed seeing you lately !
Workin', despite BHO! Yeah, missed being here, playing 'WHACK-A-TROLL' with everyone.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
LOL……………….Looking!
I not only voted for Reagan twice, but worked on his campains twice, at the state level; though I was already out of my twenties.
In my twenties, I worked on the GOP's candidate's presidential campaign and he won twice, as well. ;^)
And now I've stepped in it and given away my age. ;-(
Glad you have a job, many can no longer say that………….due to BHO!
I missed ya; you are good at "WHACK-A-TROLL " and I always enjoy watching you do it !
I think putting the words "conservative" and "socialist" together creates an oxymoron.
I just spoke to an engineer friend who is open to socialism because he thinks it will prevent a complete implosion of the economy. A planned economy appeals to his meticulous nature. He intuitively fears and resents the chaos of the markel place. He sees financial people or any wheeler dealer type as not providing any value to society.
Nobody has made a convincing arguement abouth the benefits of free markets to him and the volatility of the market place terrifies and frustrates him.
Ty, 1rc, likewise, I'm sure!
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Yw, as ever.
I believe in unicorns that pee hot cocoa and use sacks full of dead leprechauns for mattresses.
From what I've heard the last few days, the European Union is collapsing
as we speak…Last night, an economist and trend analyst said
Europe is failing, Greece, Portugal and Italy will go first…He also predicted
the fall will find it's way here in short order because of all the spending..
We'll see if he was right!
I would love to see the same questions asked of any former Soviet satellite country.
Run that same poll with identical questions in Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria, the Baltic States (if you could even get enough respondents before being run out of town), and see what the results are.
I'd bet my next year's salary that you wouldn't get a fraction of the positive responses from them that this poll seems to have gotten from our poorly-educated citizenry.
This poll is one of the canaries in the coal mine, demonstrating how an ignorant electorate can wreak havoc on our Republic, as they did electing this "Trainee President" we're now saddled with. I just love paying the ongoing price for his OJT.
Socialism has proven to be impractical, stifling initiative. Do we have to try it for ourselves, after having witnessed its destructive results throughout the world, to satisfy the curiosity of a bunch of woozy libs?
I know from observation that shooting oneself in the foot is crippling; therefore, I haven't done that to myself. It seems our current alleged "leadership" doesn't understand that sort of cause and effect relationship.
Pass the delta smelt and the tartar sauce too, please.
But don't forget to provide him with some fish while you are teaching him, otherwise he'll starve to death.
Obama was a Marxist socialist when I met him in 1980.
It seemed to be working better than what we've got now. You tell me, smart ass.
You just now figured out you're living under an increasingly socialist system of government? You might as well crawl back under your rock and go back to sleep.
I agree Randy – now if anyone can enlighten me as to how people can't seem to grasp the consequences of this, I'm all ears! (or in this case, eyes
)
Always fun to witness, 1red beating back a troll!
Someone did some extra reading for history class.
And you make a great point about the slave trade. The facts you point out are conveniently left out or over looked by many "scholars" and "intellectuals". Its a point I always try to make whenever the topic of slaves, the slave trade, and how evil europeans are because of it.
Your other points are great, as well. Well done.
It looks like I'm the one who struck a nerve. Nothing you've said has phased me in the least. I am rather enjoying watching you make an ass of yourself though. Please continue. I could use the entertainment.
If anyone read the actual report you would see that Gallup acknowledges that this 36% is the smallest percentage favorable for quite some time.
Another spin to this poll is that after decades of pro big government/socialist propaganda ONLY 36% of Americans think favorable of socialism. If this same poll was taken in Europe you would see much, much higher favorables.
You met Obama in '80? Do tell! How do you know he was a Marxist Socialist? How intriguing.
There the mindless bookman goes again…when you lose an argument, just call you opponent a racist!
I should have known the two of you were friends, you and Hanzo are both bomb throwers – not interested in debate.
Yes, the same thing BTW, they all lead to Communism/Facism.Two sides of the same coin, virtually indistinguishable,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
The College Professors in this country have LONG been pushing for Socialism. Is it any wonder so many College students have a radical an inaccurate view of America? Is there anybody out there that doesn't think our history books in the schools haven't been tampered with?? From the media to the school teachers union, there has been a concerted effort to overthrow this country and our Constitution. Along with the operatives within the Liberal Democratic movement; it's been there for years. I would even include some Republicans in this as well. Thank God people all over the country are wanting to take America back from these radical idiots.
We need to stay out of foreign conflicts, except when we need to stand up for OUR allies.
We need to be fiscally conservative in our spending. Cut off aid to countries that hate us.
We need to adhere to our Constitution
We shouldn't care about any new world order, tell'em to take a hike.
We don't want your stinking Al Whore Global Warming tax on America. It was a farce to begin with.
We don't need or want any carbon taxes so Al Whore and friends can enrich themselves.
We need our leaders to secure our borders and to protect the Citizen's of this country.
Socialist Liberals hate all these ideas.
Well since 40% of the people pay no taxes and are sponges off the rest of us I think the number is 4% low.
We have “only” ourselves to blame for this mess:
This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone has it all figured out. It’s sad that most of the people of the US don’t.
“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
The republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Author Unknown
A conservative in no way can favor socialism by logic. It just shows that 20% of people who say they are conservative are stupid also, perhaps because they are conservative and don't know what socialism is, or perhaps they are socialist that doesn't know what conservatism is.
Of course democrats support "socialism"; that is what their party stands for. Research into the Soviet archives has shown that the DFL was created by the Communist Party USA in 1924, beginning with the labor union movement (which is what comminism is – dictatorship of the proletariat [working class] – workers of the world unite!, etc). It began with the infamous Industrial Workers of the World (IWW); which soon was replaced with the American Federation of Labor – Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL – CIO); then became the Farm-Labor Perty (DFL).
All one needs to do to verify this, is to print out the DFL party platform and compare it with the U.S.S.R. Const., (specifically Ch 10); and the Program for the Communist Party USA, and you wil see that it is identical! Most of it is word for word. THAT is precisely what the DFL stands for.
I served in a war to keep this sedition out of this country, but it seems that the Viet – Cong now occupy the White House. I don't know if "Americanism" can be reclaimed or not. Do you?
and it's been like this for the past 20 years…
Many thanks for the kind words, but I admit that I don't know everything……just a lot. LOL
As a matter of fact, Bookie slipped up and did pull the wool over my eyes and probably everyone else's, here, last night; however, I was doing some casual reading at another site and <B.WHAM, some words flew off the screen, hit me between the eyes, and red lights began flashing! I now know exactly what Bookie is and shall be sharing it with everyone here.
Slavery is alive and well in Africa, today……………….amongst blacks. This is also nobody on the left is willing to talk about. Please, Skeeter, keep educating everyone you know, even casually, about the true facats of slav ery and the slave trade; as shall I.
See my latest post to Bookman……………….all shall be revealed ! LOL
Bookie, Bookie, Bookie………………….you were PWN3D last night and shall be, yet again, after I get done with you!
I'm NOT a "bomb thrower"; unless, by that you mean that I destroyed you, you filthy UNAMERICAN POS.
My "content" was far more than a pathetic "decent"; compared to the garbage your posts, my replies were not just substantive, but brilliant……..albeit, common knowledge at the fifth grade level! LOL
I am extremely well informed, very knowledgeable, but unfortunately, not as knowledgeable about extreme lefty terms and groups as you. Though you dropped clues ( which I had picked up on, but had misattributed ), I was unaware the meaning of, I brushed them off to being drivel and batted you about the head about them. Please forgive that error, as now that I have serendipitously come upon one of them, I shall expose you for just what and who you are!
The two word term, "ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY" is still utter drivel, but it is the name of a radical lefty group, an off shoot of the CAMPAIGN FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, which was chaired by the '60s MARXIST/COMMIE HIPPIE/DIPPY RADICAL TOM HAYDEN.
While at Occidental, Obama gave his first political speech at the urgings of his first political mentor,Prof Roger Boesche, at an event sponsored by theSTUDENTS FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, a branch of the Hayden group.
So there ya go, Bookie, You may not be a damned RED DIAPER BABY ( though I doubt you tell the truth about yourself ), but you ARE, indeed, a stinking RED !
You don't like that I tell the truth, ergo, you call what I post about you "insults" and cry in your beer that I am a "bomb thrower", when, in point of fact, your idols were bomb makers and bomb throwers of the worst kind………………………………AMERICAN BORN AND BRED TERRORIST AMERICA HATERS !
You have NO idea what a "flame war" is, nor what kind of insults such things entail.
To use an old 1960s/early '70s hippie retort ( which you will have to fill the blanks in for the initials )……………………………UP AGAINST THE WALL, YOU MF !
FYI………………I gave you a "serious argument" last night, you pustule on the arse of America; you just couldn't handle it and neither are you capable of
engaging in an actual debate!
Last night, a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar lefty troll, Bookman4FR, posted to this thread. He used some ridiculous sounding terms, which none of us recognized, one of which was "ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY".
Latter, rather serendipitously, I happened upon that term, while reading at another site, about an entirely different topic. Now that I know what that term means* and just WHO was and is involved with it, Bookie's posts are even more appalling!
From now on, I suggest that should a troll or a regular poster come across a word or term, which they are unfamiliar with, LOOK IT UP ! The answer may not be as eye opening as what I discovered, but at least you will have learned something and will be better able to debate ( if needs be ) the poster who used it.
* It's a longish explanation, so if anyone is curious, please find and read the reply I made to Bookie, a bit earlier, on this thread. THANKS !
funniest thing about socialism is its anti-social, very Orwellian use of words. Capitalism is founded on social cooperation and freedom, socialism is founded on govt. force and coercion and the moron libs think they are egalitarian, how can they be so blind? they give American a bad name!
That is a great articulation of what I have long known. Spot on and very insightful. Kudos.
I remember them changing History class to Social Studies. Even at the age of 10 that struck me as Commie thing to do.
I remember them changing History class to Social Studies. Even at the age of 10 that struck me as Commie thing to do.
I remember my mother having fits over the name change and being upset at how watered down curiculum was getting. The thing is, what was taught when I was in school, was a whole lot MORE than what was/is being taught, even in great private schools, to later generations. OTOH, when my mother was in high school, she had micro and macro economics classes, as well as truly in depth and separate history and geography classes.
You guys are pathetic! Congratulating yourselves about the meaningless snipping that you do. 1redcent has some decent content but is really just a bomb thrower interested in flaming and personal attack. He would do better to have a more serious argument.
All of what i posted was taken from http://socialistparty-usa.org/. you people might actually want to take a look at it so you can see exactly what they are for and against. Alot of you people need to start using our head when you read and reply to posts on here and stop getting so emotional. Nowhere in my post did it say i was for any of these policies. I support the "Government needs to leave me the hell alone" policy.
By the way Hanzo,you forgot the "c" in schmuck. i guess your a good example of how well our public school system works.
I didn't take micro and macro economics until college. I ended up with a B in micro because my professor was a proglib and I preferred Smith over Keynes. Politics is everywhere.
Wow, you post comments which no one can understand and you point out a typo in my reply? What planet do you currently reside on?Your syntax, grammar and spelling are juvenile. If you indeed post the above info as a cautionary effort, why not state that? "You people are quite happy to have…"? WTF are we supposed to think? If you do agree with us, sorry to offend you, I also mistook your comments, perhaps you should, yourself, go to one of the public schools you mentioned. My kids are homeschooled and my 11 year old has no problem ellucidating his thoughts. Especially not to the point of seeming to state the opposite of how he feels.Perhaps you could hire my youngest to grade your posts before presenting them for public consumption.How many times do you say"you people" in a day? Please re-read your comments, maybe it'll bring a smile to your face after you realise that you have a mistake in viryually EVERY sentence you "type". ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
I had neither in high school, either and I went to private school; a an excellent one.
But my mother had it in high school in the late '30s.
It was equivalent,. at the least, to a masters degree from an Ivy League college, today; perhaps even a Doctorate.
OTOH, an 8th grade education, of my grandparents' day, was even better than that!
Thankfully, my parents and grandparents didn't abrogate their responsibilities and I learned a very great deal at home; some of it, just by listening to the adults discuss the news, politics, and history; as well as other things.
Oh I enjoy watching Hanzo kneecap trolls, as he enjoys watching me do the same. It's really that simple, you flaming MARXIST/COMMIE POS moron.
The only "bomb throwers" are your old pals from the WEATHERMEN; Bookie!
"DEBATE" ?
Are you serious?
You have yet to even actually attempted to DEBATE me or anyone else…………….you don't know HOW to debate.
Eliminate the Dept of Education. It's not that Americans are clueless, it's that we have allowed the progressives to take control of the public education system and succeed in creating a populace discouraged from believing in America and it's founding principles. It is where the progressives want this country. It's the set up they need in order to install the form of soft tyranny they seek. They may have gotten the timing wrong however and probably should have waited another generation before attempting the total socialist takeover (I give you the TPM as evidence of their over reach). Although the progressive run public school system and state run media have been successful in dumbing down America to the point they could get one of them elected, I think there may be enough Freedom loving Americans left, and some waking up from the stupor, to put a stop to it this go around.
The question in this poll isn't about voting. It's trying to convince you and me that over a third of the country "hearts" socialism. My contention is that a good portion of that 36% doesn't understand what Socialism is or what it has done in the last century. If you're arguing that more than a few people are voting with a low level understanding of politics or history then we have no argument.
Okay, but can you name all (or even most) of the countries in Africa? Or does your geographic knowledge (i.e., world vision) extend only as far as the US border?
I think that the dumbing down of America has been achieved as a result of the efforts of business – mostly big business – as they effectively use the american media to blunt our appetites for thought and sharpen the consumption of products and more media.
It is disgusting and suprisingly free of partisan politicism – just whatever sells.
ITA.
Obamunism is a unique mix of the worst of several failed ideologies. No matter how they package it, Obamunism is bad for not just America but for the entire world.
Have him read Road To Serfdom by F.A.Hayek. It is all meticulously spelled out.
Well said, it is a rather 'mixed bag' of misery, isn't it? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
….actually…Obama hasn't raised taxes a penny…for anyone. And apparently he is cutting them for 95% of Americans. So….what you are saying is just factually untrue. It may not be a significant amount…but this man is paying the same amount in taxes as he did under Bush. Obama is also cutting back on social programs in 2011…if you didn't hear. So, frankly, you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm not an Obamite. I just like to be fair and have some intellectual integrity when I attack somebody's stance.
Seriously, who likes paying taxes? The taxes go so we don't have old people rotting in ditches like medieval times and so we can defend our country. It also pays so people who get laid off will have time to get themselves on their feet in between jobs and so they don't end up homeless…which will lower property values and affect the nation's overall wealth. These are pretty obvious services that we need. Social Security can go, but everything else, we need to keep. Sure, people abuse the welfare program, but unemployment/welfare accounts for 11% of the budget (~3% of your paycheck) and if I had to guess, 70 – 80% of people on welfare are honest people who are in need of assistance so that means 3 – 4 % of the budget is a "handout" to undeserving people which translates to ~1% of your paycheck. Seriously.
15% percent of your paycheck, on the other hand, goes to Social Security, Medicare (old people), and Defense. Healthcare reform (which republicans don't seem to understand how important it is) would allow us to lower the amount of money put into Medicare (assuming it was written with that concerted goal in mind). We, of course, need to reform Social Security. Payments on national debt account for 10% of our budget, so lowering or ridding of the national debt by investing or promoting industry would also help the situation.
See how logical it all is. This isn't about being a bleeding heart. This is about having a functioning, sustainable society. It's not all or nothing. It's not socialism or anarchy. It's some combination of the two. Just stop being dogmatic about it. Sometimes, we need social programs and government intervention. Sometimes, we need less government. This is about assessing which is which.
You're so stupid, Guest, that you don't even deserve an in depth reply.
If anyone wants to see evidence of just HOW dumbed down Americans have become ( you are an American, aren't you ? ) all they have to do is read your imbecilic post; you pissant moron.
Consumerism was truly begun in the mid-late Victorian era…………..when our educational system was superior to what it is today and long before there was even radio; let alone T.V. !
American business has had NOTHING whatsoever to do with the education dumbing down trajectory, which got its foot in the door 100 years ago, but really took off right after WW II, but which went into hyperdrive in the late '60s/early '70s and it IS and ALWAYS has been partisan…..led by lefties, every step of the way.
You are "disgusting" in your mordant, abject stupidity! Now crawl away and hide in a dark corner, you blithering idiot.
Yes, I c an name all of them and I can also name all of the European nations as well.
What's your point?
Fifth grade was just about the USA, when I was in school.
The sixth grade covered South America, which was taught the same way USA history and geography was taught and I can still do South America as well.
You want my entire CV, from grammar school, do you ? LOL
just remember that socialism is the structure of many religious organizations, like monasteries for example. However, you can choose to live that lifestyle if you wish in America. I think socialism works in small scale societies where like minded people bound by a common religion can live and work together. They are taught to love one another. Socialism can work in a family environment too. However, in a large scale society where people do not know one another, greed is more likely to take hold and someone can take advantage of another. Socialism doesn't work. Conservatives can be family socialists only. lol.
Except it wasn't Churchill's. That has been erroneously attributed to him, but no one knows from whence it actually came.
just say no to nightingale for governor wrong for Governor Bad for california!!!!
Well, with today's right wing standing next to McCarthy, he does look more intelligent. I can see why you'd emulate him.
But objectively, yes, McCarthy looks just as stupid and paranoid as ever.
You have a typo there, I think you meant "Bush" has a 36% approval rating. At thats when he was really popular back in 2005. I'm just ribbing you.
Obama's approval is up around 50%, that leaves about 10-15% of O supporters who are smart enough to ignore and/or see the right's propaganda for what it is. Its disappointing to see a third of our people have a positive view of socialism, but its a small number still. A good quarter to third of our citizens are stupid, ignorant or just plain whacko. They're not all right wingers, left's got 'em too.
No typo there, PAC. Latest(Feb. 10) CNN/Usa Today poll has BHO's approval rating at 36%. I'm sure an unbiased poll would reflect even lower numbers.So, exactly where do people go to view "right's propoganda"?The msm is OVERWHELMINGLY left-wing biased, and people show they know that too, according to polls. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
I like cartoons. And you keep looking, you just might find it. Try your left.
You'll have to provide a link that poll, I can't find it. The lowest approval I found from any poll was 44%. Its unlikely Obama dropped from around 48% to 36% that quickly without a major event, so unless you can prove the existence of your poll…
You're kidding, you don't know where to get right wing propaganda? Start with the places you go for news. Hannity, Beck, Huckabee and constant doses from others on Fox News, Coulter, Malkin, Ingraham, Dick Armey, Cheney(s), National Review, FrontPage, Weekly Standard, WorldNetDaily, any Breitbart environment… thats a good start. I'll bet you frequent several ot those. What, you didn't realize you were being fed misinformation in those places? Thats not very smart of you.
Considering you think left wing bias is anything lacking right wing bias, forgive me if I reject your fantasies about MSM.
I stand corrected on the poll, I thought that I heard 36% approval rating on the radio, my bad.Now, as far as the rest of your post. First ,Please don't make assumptions as to where I get my daily news. I guarantee I visit more lefty sites than you do. I have accounts at HuffHo and rumproast.
Two verrry intolerant lefty sites. Much more intolerant then anything you'll come across on the right side of the aisle.Please don't provide me with a list of Conservative websites, how stupid of you. That would be like me telling you to go to Kos, Beast, HuffHo, snarkopolitan,et al.You are such a condescending progressive/facist. Not very smart of me? Perhaps you've forgotten how I've schooled your tiny intellect in the past, what a buffoon you truly are.Fantasies about msm? With the likes of olbernut, madcow, schultz, schyster, matthews,behag,couric, sanchez,laurie. etc., etc., you're joking, right?You are a joke , you never present a cogent argument , yes virginia, BHO is a socialist! I can prove he is, can you prove he's not?Let's go, I'll school you again……..
Talk about dumb, you fit the bill quite splendidly.I don't care where BHO was born, he isn't qualified to be president and he is a hardcore Socialist at least. Nice attempt at changing the focus of the debate. Your original post was defending your dear leader from the label of Socialist, if you can, please describe for me why he is not a Socialist.
"It's obvious you consider…". What an asinine statement in it's entirety, from a complete and total ass.You're such a typical statist/progressive/facist. Your entire post is chock full of insinuations, ad homs, innuendo and presumption. Try to form a sentient, lucid, cogent thought and present it in a valid manner, junior.Is your beloved a Socialist? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Along with the above mentioned 'news' anchors let's not forget mitchell, smith,stephanopoulos,
evans, krugman, roberts(both of them),blitzer, strassman, et al, the list goes on and on. I can't believe that you are so bereft of objectivity you can't see the msm(abc,nbc,cbs,msnbc,cnn,pbsetc.)
project a bias.You need to remove your head from your posterior, get some fresh air and allow a bit of light to shine on you.How about that 'birther' issue? Did you know that 2 democrat operatives, Linda Starr and Philip Berg, are the people who gave the issue legs?That's right, and Hillary wanted to use it in the dem primaries. Boy oh boy, you should change your screen name to piece a work, just like the other trolls,you present nothing to back up your claims, just casting statements in order to seem proficient on subject matter, dosen't work aropund here, must present facts. If we are wrong, we'll admit it, too bad prog/facists will defend their lies to the bitter end. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Of course evey right winger gets their news from one or some of the sources I mentioned. Its why they're so misinformed.
Again, its obvious you consider liberal bias to be anything not containing right wing bias, so your list is pretty useless. Agreed Olberman and Maddow are straight biased. Matthews is a total tool. Blitzer is just a tool.
Why does it matter who started the birther nonsense? Its not surprisng Hillary wanted to use it in the primary. Its politics dummy, and the Clintons don't fear dirty politics. Its a big reason Hillary didn't win. The important thing is that birtherism still survives because idiots get their news from right wing propaganda and Republicans and they keep hope alive for said idiots to vanquish the demon known as Obama. Do you believe Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States?
You sure talk a lot for saying nothing. And its the same thing over and over.
If you read the definition of socialism you will learn the actions of the past year do not equate to socialism. The gov saved these companies, it didn't wholly take them over. The fact some banks have already paid the money back and all of them will be freed from gov's teet reinforces this fact. Your argument is nothing more than a political tact. Besides, before we disprove Obama is a socialist, don't you first need to prove he is? Otherwise its nothing more than a religion to you. For as much as you say I presume and insinuate, Its stunning how right I am.
It's stunning how ignorant you are. Perhaps you need to consult a decent lexicon. Obviously, you've absolutely no idea what socialism is. Doublespeak much? The gov't. 'saved' these companies? Ha ha ha ha ha….you are verrrrrry dense. When the gov't. buys into companies with taxpayer funds and their is no plebiscite , this is socialism. When the gov't. uses heavy handed techniques to try and take over 1/6th of the economy(healthcare), this is socialism, when the gov,'t. tries to regulate industry in the name of junk science, resulting in the strangulation of business(GW $ cap and trade), this is socialism,when the gov't. wants to overturn a SCOTUS decision by Constitutional Convention, this is Facism(let's be truthful here), when the gov't. FORCES some companies to take 'bailout funds'(even yhough they don't want it), and then attempts to make them pay a tax, after they've already repayed the "loans"(as well as forcing other banks who never participated to pay the tax), this is Facism……………
After ranting about GWB for 8 years, stating he was overreaching in his scope as POTUS, dosen't it just scare the hell out of progressives to witness the absolute trampling of the Constitution by the current administration?
Anyway, your absolute ignorance of political history and the genesis of these organic movements is both stupifying and apparent immediately.I could list more examples, why bother?You can't disprove anything, not only are you uneducated on the subject at hand, you're much too limited in your cogent thought process to form a lucid, sentient, valid opinion on this issue.It's stunning how right you are?That dosen't make sense, as you've proven nothing.I suppose when you're always wrong it would be stunning if you were correct, however that's not the case. Have a nice day.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
You're entitled to your opinoins, but not to your facts.
You have ground to stand on in point of the ownership stake the government took in companies. The rest is just partisan delusion- health care reform, regulation, cap and trade, fascism and the like.
There is nothing for me to disprove given you have proven nothing. Other than you have a skill at ranting partisan talking points. Your master has taught you well.
"You're entitled to your opinoins(sic), but not to your facts". Ha ha….how typical.
Don't address the issue or try to refute my post, simply cast aspersions in a lame attempt to deflect attention from your glaringly apparent lack of knowledge.
Do you know of the roots of Facism/Progressivism?I didn't think so.Do you know the aims, creed, manifestations of Socialism? I didn't think so.
"Ranting partisan talking points"? Your transparent effort to appear knowledgeable is laughable.Pretending to be an intellectuel dosen't become you. My suggestion to you is to actually learn the subject matter at hand, study history in order to maintain a grasp of that which you speak, then try to form a valid, thoughtful opinion so that you don't fall on your face and sound doubly stupid.Your lack of a response speaks volumes in and of itself. Have a nice day.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
Isn't a "lack of response" what you get most times? It shouldn't surprise you anymore.
I had a very knowledgable and wise response but this piece of shit website keeps crashing my browser. Breitbart can't do anything right, except make money off rubes. But thats the easiest game in town. Just ask Limbaugh, he made a mint off rubes.
I did address the issue, read again. Other than that, I just don't respond to partisan delusions. Thats not true, I'm here aren't I. Oh well. You can hang your hat on that one.
Yeah, sure, whatever.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Hanzo
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
Want to donate to charity, but don’t have the money to?
As a student, I always wanted to donate to charity, but I never had enough money. Now, with all of these global problems like the economic crisis occuring, it’s even harder.
I made the solution, which is you just complete 1 survey, and with the money you make from that, I will donate it all to UNICEF. Please just do ONE GREAT THING, and DONATE FOR FREE!
Your ONE SECOND SAVES ONE LIFE!
http://www.clickforaid.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.