Global Warming Fringe Is Coming For Your Pet
by Bret JacobsonWhen it comes to global warming alarmists’ far-Green fringe, it’s not just chickens and cows that harm the environment. Because Fido feeds and Kitty craps, you may also have to kill your pet. See more here and here, and enjoy the latest cartoon.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
791 Comments
Sacrifices have to be made! In the spirit of these findings, let’s kill the liberals pets first …come Fido, you must die for our Barry, blessed be his name, and the obese one, Owlgore!
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by dncfail: #tcot #sgp #orca Global Warming Fringe Is Coming For Your Pet http://url4.eu/gwrs...
All I have to say, is to quote Charlton Heston, "I'll give you my gun (and puppy) when you take it from my cold, dead hands." Bring it on!
"Anyone trying to save the planet by offing my dog will find their carbon emissions permanently reduced to zero."
I have to concur on this comment! Same goes for attempting to off my two little kitties!
I wonder how many pets Al Bore has, er, had?
That is the last thing politicians dare not touch. Americans loves their dog and they even call it Joe.
I guess it doesn't matter, the death panel will kill me first!! The pups will be depressed in my absence anyway…
Bret Jacobson, the anti-intellectualism you are pushing on "the base" is disturbing at best. But even more disturbing is the rabid enthusiasm and unquestioning obedience with which they devour it.
These people are Professors???? Environmentalists ARE the problem. They take a falacious argument and ramp it up to global proportions and ASSume they are right. My solution is to take all the environmentalists and send them to Jonestown and make sure there is plenty of coolaid available. Let them create their 'sustainable' environment there. These people have way to much time on their hands. Kick them off their tenure and make them work for a living.
You buy this sh-t? Are you one of the enviro's? Or are you just here to spout typical liberal talking points? The people you pretend to support are by all accounts total whack jobs, the same ones who support abortions but oppose capital punsihment for convicted killers. I only wish your mother held the same baby killing belief that you seem to embrace.
It's time to apply Carbon Offsets on the mouths of Reid, Pelozi, Waxman, Markey, and Gore for spreading their Global Warming propaganda BULLS$!T. We all know that BULLS$!T also contributes to the so-called Global Warming rhetoric and these morons are spreading it!
thank you for your intelligent, rational, and articulate response.
you can't fix stupid -Ron White-
see, this is the exact kind of rabid fundamentalist anti-intellectualism i was talking about.
hey story keeper: do you believe in creationism? a 4000 year old earth? keep on keepin' on, with people like you at the base of the republican party, you guys will sink faster than a rock.
The thing is most America does not understand nor care about cap & trade …. we laugh about this now but it effects everything … and I do mean EVERYTHING ….
Everything leaves a carbon footprint !!!!
environmentalists bitch about driving big SUV's and say we need to ditch them… then a study finds that a big dog hurts the environment more than an SUV. These are the same environmentalists who have said we need to stop eating meat because of the carbon emissions involved. Right. They aren't ever going to advocate that we don't keep dogs and other types of "high carbon emission" pets. riiiiiight.
After Cap and Tax goes through we're going to need our pets to feed the family.
Oh, look – scott z, the paid agitator, is back. We need a sign that says "Don't feed the piggy!"
"Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it."
How's that ice age working for ya?
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,...
Ok scott, you've convinced me, despite your denials it is obvious that you are working for some group. You use typical Alinsky-esque tactics, don't seem to have a job (unless this is it), and respond with such "enthusiasm" that you either have a mental illness or need to do this for the money.
Someone should track your IP address and see who you work for.
Hey, a new restaurant!
HOW MUCH IS THAT DOGGIE IN THE WINE SAUCE?: A GREEN FRIENDLY RESTAURANT REVIEW
http://naturalfake.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/how-m...
damn…this nonsense is just turning Orwell into a regular prophet "four legs good, two legs baaaad"
carbon pawprint…oh for the love of…..
stay out of my bank account, out of my health care, and for f's sake, let me have my damn dogs!
its not government, its parental control- bah!
synecdoche
Is this the same "anti-intellectualism" that declares the debate on AGW closed just because a "consensus" is arrived at by so-called scientists? A little bit of knowledge for ya, there is no such thing as a consensus in science. Either it is proven or not.
"Either it is proven or not. "
A little bit of knowledge for ya, gravity is only a theory- as described only by the general theory of relativity. yet unfortunately i doubt you'd be willing to take a long walk off a short pier.
The irony, Kevin S responds with PRECISELY the kind of anti-intellectualism I was talking about.
ohhh! a witch hunt to cull the dissenters and ideologically unpure from the pack!
don't conservatives just LOOOVE a good Red Scare every now and again!
Not to feed troll, but scientists have been able to predict how gravity will effect something. The “consensus” has yet to correctly predict what the temperature will be for a certain amount of co2.
i dunno. how's that ability to properly format URLs working for ya?
Give it up Scott, you're just making yourself look bad.
So, what's for dinner tonight, Chinese or Korean?
Remember, we're eating to save the planet!
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,...
Either a theory is proven or it is not. If it is not proven the it is because the theory is wrong, or we just haven't been able to figure it out. But it is not closed to debate. Anti-intellectualism is stating that the debate is closed when there is no proof that the theory is correct. The AGW kool-aid drinkers can't accept this little fact, so instead of continuously debating the issue, providing all information and data, it is declared closed.
I have two dogs, a cat, and lots of ammo
Come and get them if you DARE!!
indeed. this is exactly the kind of anti-intellectualism I was talking about.
you assert that scientists have been wrong before, so by definition they are (probably? maybe?) wrong this time as well. each claim must be examined on a case by case basis,and the supporting evidence evaluated.
your article you yourself posted quotes: "Some scientists like Donald Oilman, chief of the National Weather Service's long-range-prediction group, think that the cooling trend may be only temporary. But all agree that vastly more information is needed about the major influences on the earth's climate. "
On the other hand, the IPCC has been evaluating global climate change for the past 20 years, since 1988. In that time there have been tens of thousands of scientists representing nearly every country on the planet engaged in the study of global climate change, and it is ongoing.
The many publically available reports written by the IPCC generally take several years to produce, consist of people from over 130 countries including more than 2500 scientific expert reviewers, more than 800 contributing authors, and more than 450 lead authors each.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental_Pa...
to even attempt to compare or equate the amount of data, research, and conclusions of your Time magazine article from 1974 to that available and published in peer reviewed literature over the past 20 years regarding global climate change and the overwhelming scientific consensus formed is absurd, and only proves your intellectual sloth.
Victoria University professors Brenda and Robert Vale, architects who specialise in sustainable living….
When did architects become scientists? I know, what's it matter their credentials since the gullible GW sheeple swallow it whole. And how exactly is having a hen house with chickens, say I eat chicken three nights a week, any less a carbon footprint than poor Fido's, who sleeps most of the day , carbon paw prints.
Here's a more commonsense approach for architects, climate gurus, Brenda and Robert, eat dry dog food and water with Fido at every meal and save the chickens. Of course, the media has absolutely no commonsense filters to stop printing the utterances of these morons.
"this is exactly the kind of anti-intellectualism I was talking about."
you oughta know. scottie, you're a classic example of someone who is educated far beyond their intelligence…
i know what i'll be feeding my dogs after the first enviro-whacko comes after them. come to think of it, i'm gonna start setting out bait and traps- my dog food bill will be down to zero in no time! hmmm, one of my dogs has bad allergies, good thing their new diet will be 100% organic…
I'm hardly ideologically pure and have said several things that were unpopular on this site. You see, I actually speak my mind rather than regurgitating talking points from one side.
But hey, nice attempt at playing the victim and trying to make "conservatives" look like nuts – that seems to be your only goal and it is pretty pathetic.
Do you really think the debate about gravity is closed?
Oh boy…..
I'm just waiting for the carbon squads to start showing up and killing off not only animals but people as well for going over their carbon quota for the year. Don't laugh, we're headed in that direction if we don't stop this man-made climate change nonsense.
This isn't the first artivle about the "pets are bad for the climate", scotty-boy. The first one I read was actually put out by the people pushing this absurdity.
Do try to keep up………………………………………………………………….
Without any carbon emission, all plant life on the earth would die.
Carbon is NOT the problem the enviro terrorists claim it is.
Should the GLOBAL WARMING and PETA true believers get their way, almost all plant life would die. Then what would those precious vegans eat ?
If these nut jobs even tried to come after my 3 cats and 2 dogs they would be nothing but a pile of bones. After the pit bull ripped them apart the yorkiepom and the cats would eat the leftovers. I hate these people. They want to kill my elderly father with their healh scare bill, kill my pets with their enviromental communist agenda, make everyone equally poor with their systematic destruction of the financial sector and so on. This is what happens when the crazy people are let out of the asylum!
For the record, I swear I have only been joking for several years now when I refer to all the cats we have as "emergency blizzard supplies."
And despite the cooling temperatures and the colder winter being expected, with the rising prices for food and energy, and especially despite the PETA people who think animals are better off dead than kept as pets, I would prefer to keep it that way!
"But it is not closed to debate."
no, much like creationism and flat eathers, the debate rages.
but scientific consensus has indeed been reached.
if you can refute anything in my post, i challenge you to refute it.
Actually chicken and other meats are a major component of dry dog food. Fido sure is not a natural vegan, and needs animal-based proteins to survive. The grain components are more filler than anything else.
And why do people by dog food that advertises "the goodness of wholesome vegetables"? Did you ever see a dog eagerly consume a fresh carrot from your garden, or chow down on plain green peas?
"But hey, nice attempt at playing the victim"
someone called for the investigation of my IP address and employer. And it's not the first time.I'd say that's a bit out of bounds.
"trying to make "conservatives" look like nuts"
you're handling that one well enough on your own…
Well, when you consider the very large "carbon footprint" to provide Granny with medicines, age-related medical treatments, that horrendously Earth-destroying "end-of-life" advanced care…
Pay no attention to Scott. He’s a devout citizen of the 57th state, his love of Barry, is well…weird, or creepy – - you pick.
ok then. i challenge *you* to refute anything in my post.
In a perfect Obama utopia only the good govt. bureaucrats can have pets, not the tax slaves
FYI- PETA, those angelic loving caring libs, kill 97% of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption in 2006
"And it's not the first time that has happened on this blog. I'd say that's a bit out of bounds."
Yes, it is about as out of bounds as "checking for id" before someone can vote. I just think people should know when ACORN/Obama goons are trolling around under the cloak of secrecy.
After all, you guys are all for "transparency" – besides, you act like thuggery and astroturf isn't par for the course for Obama.
Scott what do you want, “pistols at dawn?” Righteous indignation is no way to gather friends, or convince your enemies. The world gets warm, the world gets cold, it’s called the “weather.” Lighten up Frances (Scott,) and have a steak. Don’t kill your pets, it’ll be okay!
i have liberal views, and i am proud of them.
why must any dissenting view be subject to background checks? is it hard to believe there are people in the world who disagree with you?
shoe on the other foot, for all i know, this entire website and all commenters are bought and paid for by RNC funds.yet i don't even make that charge.
scotty,
I'll challange you. It was already established as fact yesterday that you are here working professionally at the behest of someone, yet to be determined or real. You even get an hour off for lunch. I've read some of your posts tonight. YOU are not the same scotty who was here entertaining US yesterday. Today, you are more eloquent and intelligent. I don't think you took any crash courses over night, which leads me to deduce there are several people using your alias "scott_z". In any event, why don't you give it up and go back to carrying Ariana's water?
You've irriated the nice folk here enough today, even picking on women. WoW! I'm impressed with your manliness…………..
http://www.petakillsanimals.com
http://www.petakillsanimals.com
Does this mean all the menus must now change in all the Chinese Resturants?
You come here and impugn all who don't agree with you and now, scotty boy, you're trying to play the victim? That's rich; not to mention hypocritical !
Oh yeah, all of us are being paid, paid big bucks. /s
If you had an ounce of shame, you'd slick away and not return. How badly do you need to be shown up and laughed at, before you reach the state of euphoria you're craving?
There is a lot more grain filler in dried dog food than meat. If the two numbskulls stuck to Fido's diet, and I didn't add anything else to their menu, it's by far a smaller carbon footprint then their grocery store selections. And, you'd be surprised how little meat a dog needs, cats not so. Coyotes for example get little. In the Third World or Mexico or on Indian reservations dogs don't get much meat. But, I'm digressing.
My basic message was let them eat dog food with Fido and forget the stupid chicken replacement for the family pet.
"why must any dissenting view be subject to background checks? is it hard to believe there are people in the world who disagree with you?"
Dissent all you want, but your self-admitted pattern has been one of intentional aggravation – the product of either a disturbed mind or "community organization."
A democracy is not served by paid thugs going around anonymously attempting to manipulate the masses via psychological tricks.
In short, if your side wasn't so damn corrupt we wouldn't be so suspicious.
Well a few of Obama's czars are now calling for population control. Yes, just like in China; demanding that there should only be one child families.
That bunch doesn't and never has believed that laws and requirements are something that they have to abide by.
Just look at Charlie Rangle, for example !
Sen. Tom Daschele was nominated by Obama to run this health care thing, but guess what tax cheat, he was gonna make all the People pay taxes for his utopian health care BS and hes a tax cheat. Our Treasury secretary(hold my calls) Tim Geithner, forgot to pay his taxes WTF! Its what happens under socialism, and this is what the American President seemsto favor though i have yet to hear a journalist ask the president directly if he was a socialist? Im waiting. Socialism is terrible for the People seems pepole have been brainwashed or something we can only keep hammering at it.
"A democracy is not served by paid thugs going around anonymously attempting to manipulate the masses via psychological tricks. "
ohhh. you mean like shouting down town hall meetings?
LOL.
good one cowboy
My posts are far more well reasoned and articulate than any of yours are and at least I know the difference between "their" and "they're" ( even there ! ); unlike you !
Save the dog, retroactively abort a liberal.
thank you for your well reasoned and articulate response.
Exactly so and the few names that both of us posted are but the tip of the iceberg of frauds and criminals ( including the Obamas, who also are cheats ) in the Dem hierarchy now !
Again Scott, that would be your side, at least when you dems aren't begging mass murderers like Jim Jones to fill up your town halls for free.
I'm begining to see a pattern with you though – you accuse the right of the things that the left is guilty of.
I'm happy to see you laughing at yourself though – trust me you aren't alone.
Except for the Muslims. They 9 babies per year to 1 Caucasion child here in the United States.
That's all ya got…………………scotty boy ? LOL
Of course Obama will set aside exceptions; don'tcha know.
All are equal, but some are more equal than others.
I have only seen one big carbon footprint on this blog and it belongs to scott_z. So much carbon expelled in so much hot breath should pay a hefty tax. His rhetoric is cast in cement and is not even debatable on an intellectial level. He is pulling everybody's chain for responses and is getting paid for it.
Did anybody here ever hear of the " ignore button" ?
quick quiz, how many times did scott z use the term 'anti-intellectualism'
ANS; Who the F cares what Scott sez
go easy on Michelle, I know plenty of libs who, when your debating them, go all angelic and would give the shirt off their back to "help" everyone, so they say, and talk of "gladly paying extra taxes" then come to find out they are tax cheats, its truly sick, i dont know how these people live with themselves, i mean their lives are a big a lie, and dont get me started on tom daschles voice, that whispery pleading soft spoken tolerant do-gooder whine, in fact just yesterday harry reid was speaking in that exact caring effette tone, what gives??????? ITs the sign of a liar
As for the carbon tax itself, the toilets of the future in our homes will have a place for $ bills every time you need to flush. The Enviro insane are running the asylum and Al Gore is getting richer.
I believe in taking care of our planet and not trashing it, but this is beyond real.
"Today, you are more eloquent and intelligent."
lol. maybe i'm in a better mood. but rest assured, i am the same guy.
i might say that most times i am on this blog, you are too. maybe you are a corporate "plant" from brietbart to counter me?
Hey idiot, he is linked to 2 articles from different papers by different people. He is not pedaling it, he is making us aware. That is what you libs like right, awareness? Troll elsewhere fledgling.
The left is a hotbed of thuggery that pales in comparison to the (I'm guessing) pointless attempts for these fine folks to slay a troll (so to speak).
MO had no compunction in being part of the graft ( special, just about unheard of, mortgage from the Northern Trust, getting an all of a sudden made up job for over $300,000 per year, etc. ) nor in making sure that all of those icky poor folks got shipped off to some clinic when they showed up at the hospital's ER, that spent more to give her a "special job". Think about how many poor folks that massive yearly stipend could have covered care for. And have you seen the pawltry sums the Obamas gave to charity, before he decided to run for president?
Liberals may talk the talk, but when it comes down to it, they NEVER walk the walk re charity, taking care of "the people", really caring about the poor and down trodden.
Ooooooooooooh Dashole ( yes, I do know how to really spell his name ) makes my skin crawl, when he talks; but then, so do Reid and Pelosi and Obama.
this is why America is ont he brink of collapse… Does America not understand this ?? Every and I mean every person in the USA will be taxed !!!!! Everything will have a larger TAX !!!! Do you think they will keep the tax rate the same once they get their greedy hands on it !!!!! Hell no !!!!
Dam America wake the F up !!!!
Hey…did you see Glenn Beck tonight??? Tell Al Gore he must do as he says…..he is such a two faced liar…..and he wants to still eat meat?? just when PETA challenges him to a debate on how much feed animals are contirbuting to global warming??? more CO2 than all the fossil fuels combined???
get real big AL….and sell your private Gulfstream jet, supersized McMansion….and ride a bike around the globe if you truly believe in Global warming. lead by example…not with your wallet or investments in gaining huge profits from this Global warming BS…..OK?
be mad !!! be very mad!!! Call and let them know how mad you are !!!! Obama, Gore, Reid and Pelosi are killing this nation !!!!!
Well…………..I understand it; I understood last year, I've understood that the hoaxes ( "GLOBAL COOLING"/GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE/ THE POPULATION BOMB ) are hoaxes, from the first time they all came out.
Passing CAP&TAX will destroy this nation and that's the plan.
Bullshit zippy.
You know better than my being a corporate plant, for Breitbart, or anyone else. I am an equal opportunity irritant. I have been on this site from day one, hour one. I'm a freelance Patriot, not a paid shill like you and Syntax. Speaking of shills, what happened to your other homeboy, "palmtree"?
You pompous pontificating peckerwoods are all alike. Flaccid, at Lake Placid.
People should only have fish for pets because fish have no feet
"Today, you are more eloquent and intelligent." have you considered the possibility that today he's sober? or perhaps back on his meds?
but, yeah, i agree with you that he/they are only here to play troll. t'would appear there is nothing too ridiculously far to the left he/they won't rise, or sink, as it were, to defend or deflect. some lefty says pets are a threat to the environment, for example. beam-me-up-scottie here automatically dismisses it as an 'anti-intellectual' fantasy being used by the right to foment unjust hatred against what he/they see as a perfectly rational green movement. you can provide links, logic, facts, what have you, and it's like arguing with an extremely dull-witted brick wall. he is/they are either true believers or sufficiently well-paid shills, maybe both.
on this blog, i am not interested in gathering friends, and by my own tally i have no enemies (others may differ).
i am simply interested in speaking truth.
"You know better than my being a corporate plant,"
well,i've only been here for like, a couple days. so i don't know any personalities, all i usually see here is a sea of wrongheadedness.
plus, maybe Breitbart wants a "maverick"!!!
lol
If you think it's abhorrent what they are going to do to the doggie, the kitties and the cows, just wait until they crack down on the squirresl:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfABnAS5i9Q&fe...
well, my most active posts today:
1) human caused global climate change does exist and there is wide scientific consensus, reaching across many decades, tens thousands of researchers from hundreds of countries (google IPCC)
2) a health care poll given by a public relations firm hired by a consortium of 15 for-profit health care companies,as advertised on their own website, should be accepted with a heavy dose of skepticism.
if you think wither point is trollish, ridiculously far to the left, beam-me-up-scottie, or unjust hatred, please explain right now.
otherwise, i'd kindly request an apology.
and a good day to you, sir.
Oh…you’re the keeper of the truth, thanks for your help.
Hey idiot, if you go through my posts above, i linked to the IPCC reports on global climate change which consist of dozens of peer reviewed papers from tens of thousands of scientists from nearly every country on Earth with an overwhelming scientific consensus over the past 20 years.
can you speak directly to the peer reviewed IPCC reports on global climate change produced by tens of thousands of scientists representing over 130 countries with overwhelming scientific consensus over the past 20 years that i cited?
maybe just a little?
no?
now there, i never said i owned the truth, did i stanh?
hmmmm?
Oh I’m sorry Scott, I thought you knew everything, …my bad!
You must be logged in to post a comment.