Safeguarding Our Heritage
by Andrea Shea King
At the Thanksgiving dinner table we sat back, sated with turkey and all the fixins’. And as is our custom, we began reminiscing of times gone by, family members who have passed on, and others we’ve not seen for a time.
The discussion around the dinner table this year was no different. Over coffee and pie, we talked of old times, fond memories, laughter, wistfulness, future prospects, and hope mingled with thanks for our blessings, past, present and future.
The conversation turned to news of an elderly relative, a self-made man whose manner and behavior had changed markedly over the past few years. Now well into his years, this man had always been a rugged sort, a man of the earth who made a living by the sweat of his brow and the brawn of his muscle, tending his large farm and considerable holdings. His thriftiness is legendary among relatives and friends who joke that he still has his first dollar. He worked long hours from sun-up to sundown, so his financial conservatism was understandable and in many ways laudable.
He remains on the farm and today still maintains his independence, managing his land as well as the fruit of his lifelong labors — a sizeable portfolio accrued from decades of hard work, savings, and sensible investments.

Yet in the past few years, family members closest to him have noticed a change in him, something uncharacteristic of a man who was loathe to part with a dime unless it was for a necessary and sensible purpose. He had survived through many hard times — the Great Depression, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, the gas crisis and recession of the Carter years, and was especially careful with every dollar earned. So when it came to their attention that he was spending huge sums to pay off loans for some folks, buying automobiles for others, as well as other extraordinary expenditures, the family became concerned. They agreed that giving unto others was an admirable quality and that he had every right to disperse his fortune in whatever way he saw fit. But what concerned them were the sums he was spending. They grew alarmed that he might squander his hard-earned nest egg on frivolities and folks who didn’t deserve or warrant the benefit of his charity. And they were distressed that his spending of an exorbitant amount of money would lead him into bankruptcy.
Some family members who had worked the farm with our great-uncle, helping him grow it and tend it, also worried there might be little to be passed on to succeeding generations, especially those seated at the children’s table this Thanksgiving. So they convened a family meeting where it was suggested that our dear great-uncle, though still healthy and strong despite his advanced age, might be growing senile and incompetent in the conduct of his affairs. They decided to have him evaluated, understanding that if a judge rules him no longer competent to manage his affairs, steps will be taken through appropriate means to safeguard his assets and oversee his spending.

The competency hearing is scheduled for election day, November 2nd, 2010. Because you see, our uncle is your uncle too. His name is Sam. Uncle Sam. And not only our family, but millions more like ours across the country are concerned that Uncle Sam is no longer competent to conduct the affairs of this great nation. And the voters — the American family — will take charge of Uncle Sam and oversee his financial dealings because he is squandering our nation’s treasure to such an extent there soon will no longer be the American spirit, a legacy of the American dream to pass on from our founding fathers to posterity — our children and grandchildren.
We will be vigilant. We will conduct a follow-up evaluation of Uncle Sam in 2012.
To us lies the responsibility to safeguard the fortune of freedom for which “Uncle Sam” and so many Americans fought and died. To us has been given the duty to keep alive the promise of liberty given to us by previous generations for those who follow.
Ronald Reagan reminded us that freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again.
As a family protects and safeguards its heritage for posterity so shall we, beginning on November 2, 2010. Our founders gave it all — their lives, their treasure, their sacred honor. We can do no less.






Subscribe via RSS
22 Comments
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Chavez, Big Government, Big Government, Patrick Henry, Big Tweeting and others. Big Tweeting said: BigGovt: Safeguarding Our Heritage: At the Thanksgiving dinner table we sat back, sated with.. http://bit.ly/7atCd2 #BigTweet [...]
Very nicely done. I can actually here this being said over an old 1940's console style radio at my grandfathers farm in the classic radio show style. (from a history major, that was a compliment)
My Dear Ms.King, thank you for one of the most, spot on and timely analogies I have ever had the pleasure to read. I can assure you this will be passed along many, many times. Again thank you.
My iphone (2g) automatically directs callers to the answering machine, without ringing. This now means that i can never receive calls and its driving me mad! I have also checked in my settings that divert was not on etc and everything is fine, what can i do????!!
________________
[url=http://www.factorq.com/phpBB2/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=10928]unlock iphone 3g[/url]
When my dear husband got Alzheimer's disease, it wasn't memory loss that came on first, it was personality changes. Many AD people give away their money, they lose all sense of reality and responsibility. AD often takes down family members along with the person who has it. It's a terrible disease with no cure–it is terminal! Relatives often go to court to take over things. This Administration has no sense of reality and responsibility–like AD their destination is terminal and if we don't act, they'll take us with them. I can hardly wait to vote!
Ms. King – That was absolutely excellent! I have passed this along to many family members and friends.
Please contribute more to this site. Your writing is truthful, clever, and could never be misunderstood as being "hateful". Just right on the mark! Thank you.
" . . . Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom, and then lost it, have never known it again. "
-Ronald Reagan, Gubernatorial Inaugural Address, January 5, 1967
DEFENDED CONSTANTLY are the key words here
What’s the difference? The iPhone is so pricy, and now the 3g is so much cheaper.
________________
[url=http://ancestroszacapanecos.com/foro/index.php?action=profile;u=4583]unlock iphone 3g[/url]
Sounds like a Paul Harvey item–"..and now you know…the REST of the story."
Thanks for a very thought provoking article. It puts the situation our Country is in right now into simple and easy to understand terms.
It works for me. Lock everyone of the rats up so we can keep an eye on them. The incompetence is amazing. However that is not what bothers me. It is those destroying our nest to meet their ideals that truly bother me. Those should face a firing squad.
By 2010, hopefully, those who will do the evaluating will have passed the Kool-Aid they guzzled through their systems to its most appropriate repository. Systems now rid of toxic elements, and sobered up, may then regain some of the rational thought necessary for evaluating Uncle's competency.
In the intervening time, to bone up on the evaluation process, I suggest a reading list of sorts: perhaps the examiners should spend time reading history and economics written by people with actual credentials and demonstrated success in the real world of managing successfully business enterprises.
Am I missing something ? Nancy Pelosi is Congresswoman for District 8 in
California, representing a census population of circa 750,000 persons of
which 82% vote Democrat, i.e. at most 650,000, from a population in California of 36 – 40,000,000 persons. Out of a USA population on 320 – 350
million persons. She “represents” therefore 0.0017633% of the population in
California, and 0.00020312% of the US Population. Harry Reid is Senator for
Nevada, with a population of ca 2,800,000 persons. IN A CONGRESS OF 435
CONGRESSMEN AND 100 SENATORS, HOW DO THESE TWO PERSONS HAVE THE POWER TO
DECIDE LAWS AND RULES UNDER WHICH THE ENTIRE POPULATION MUST LIVE, IN A
DEMOCRACY WHICH IS PUTATIVELY RULE BY THE PEOPLE ? What don’t I understand
about “reprsentative of the People “?
After a meeting on the Friday after Thanksgiving, a local government official of foreign dissent was talking to one of my associates.
When asked how his Thanksgiving went, the official responded, "I don't celebrate a day about a bunch of whites inviting people over for dinner, killing them, and taking their land"
True story. Heard it myself. Our tax dollars are paying this persons salary.
Very nice Andrea, very nice indeed!
What a great way to put it Andrea.
Am I missing something ? How do Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have the power to set laws and rules by which the population must live and pay taxes ? Do the arithmetic ! In a Congress of 435 members and a Senate of 100 members, these are ONLY 2 People. Nancy Pelosi represents a Congressional District of at most 800,000 people of whom 82% of those who bother to vote decide for a Democrat. That means, taking the population as a whole, that she "represents" at most 600,000 people in a State with a population of 36 plus million, and a country of 320 million. Harry Reid as Senator "represents" at most 2 plus million people, the population of Nevada., in a country of 320 plus million. What don't I understand about WE the People as Sovereign, Ruler of the USA ?
[...] Big Government – Safeguarding Our Heritage [...]
AlamoJane, About 555 people control the entire population of the United States. They were elected to represent us. Like many of the folks who voted, many of these representatives are about as smart as a stone. We have had Supreme Court Judges and Senators marry sweet young things and believe she did it out of love. I personally do not like the thought of people that dumb to make decisions that affect my life on a daily basis. We could be totally energy independent if we were allowed to drill in America. Instead we send our manufacturing base and our dollars to other countries so they can use our money to destroy us. Bills must be paid sooner or later. What have we elected? Im so mad Im not coherent
Wow! She got me on that one. I was speeding through the article, and, having been involved with a competency issue in the family, was not expecting the twist toward the end.
Very good. Powerful.
[...] Our Senile Uncle Safeguarding Our Heritage [...]
EXCELLENT READ, until you brought us back to reality then the gloom set in once again, but the election years are a glimmer of hope!!!! It'll be the workers against the dependents, thank God, reality will be setting in on a lot of the dependents, WE WILL SEE!!!!!