Newt’s S.C. Secret Weapon: Taking the Fight to the Left
by Alexander MarlowLess than a week after ABC released (and Drudge essentially spoiled) the story that we were told could “end [Newt Gingrich's] career,” the former Speaker came from behind to win the South Carolina primary by a startling 13%. Not only did South Carolina voters ignore the latest unverifiable mainstream media report on the private life of a Republican candidate—a report that was specifically timed to inflict maximum damage—many of them likely voted for Gingrich to spite the MSM. Exit polling suggests that Newt’s entire margin of victory was comprised of South Carolinians who decided on their candidate near or on primary day, i.e. after ABC’s story had leaked. Those who decided after the CNN debate in which Gingrich embarrassed CNN’s John King for his liberal bias voted solidly for Newt.
Conventional wisdom is that debates don’t decide nominations, but that notion is as antiquated as the paper route. This is, after all, the media age. It’s the era of YouTube, Twitter, and the 24-hour news network. Fear the candidate who can beat the media at their own game, and right now, that candidate is Newt Gingrich.
Their imperfect track-records aside, the former speaker has been able to distinguish himself from Governor Romney in two crucial ways. The first difference is in who, or what, they are campaigning against. The foundation of Mitt Romney’s campaign is keeping a narrow focus on Barack Obama. This isn’t a bad strategy, per se, but it doesn’t comprehensively address the problems we are facing as a society. After all, Barack Obama is a product of the American left. He was raised in academia, sold to us by Hollywood, and elected by the mainstream media. The President is the tip of the iceberg, and the Republican candidate should understand that Obama is a symptom of what ails us, not the cause.
Newt has decided to run a broader campaign, addressing crony capitalism at length and waging war against Obama’s palace guards in the mainstream media. Needless to say, the media criticism in particular has resonated with South Carolina voters:
Yesterday Gingrich spoke out, yet again, against the philosophies and influence of Saul Alinsky, the patron saint of postmodern leftism. This isn’t merely how the GOP nominee should campaign, it’s also how he should govern if elected. In the battle for America’s future, our primary adversary isn’t the man in the White House, it’s the ideas and values that put him there.
Another reality in the media age is that the most articulate candidate will have the best chance to succeed. In the past couple debates, Mitt Romney has stumbled when backed into a corner on relatively minor issues such as the request to release his tax returns. Newt, on the other hand, has taken gotcha questions and skillfully and confidently rebutted them.
This is not to say Mitt hasn’t been a competent debater. He most certainly has been. But recently, Newt has presented himself as the clearer thinker. His rhetoric can soar–as Obama’s did in 2008–and in the media age, that may be what voters care about most.
The irony is, of course, that the principal beneficiaries of Gingrich winning South Carolina in such convincing fashion are the media (both old and new), because nothing boosts ratings and page views like a horse-race.
So, now we look to Florida, and that should be another wild ride. The polling there has been, for lack of a better term, schizophrenic. Newt had a monster advantage over Mitt a few weeks ago, then Romney erased that and is currently way out in front. Can Newt come back again again after blowing a big lead already? It seems like the Sunshine State is susceptible to swings in momentum, and Newt has all of it right now.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
133 Comments
in THEIR face ..
works for me..
bout time somebody
TOOK IT TO EM !
This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in the
Czech Republic as published in the Prager Zeitung of 28 April 2011.
The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of
entrusting an inexperienced man like him with the Presidency. It will
to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved
electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem
is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere
symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should
not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their
prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to
survive a multitude of idiots such as those who made him their
president."
Tax returns are a "minor issue". Spin, spin, spin. When a candidate has millions of dollars off shore, they have no business running for president.
“a report that was specifically timed to inflict maximum damage”
After watching the media attack Palin, Joe the Plumber, Bachman, Cain, etc. and leave Obama alone, I am sick of it. At 'em boys, Give 'er the gun Newt!
The reason Romney is losing? He won't do what Newt did when confronting the left wing press. Whether it's just a lack of natural inclination or a lack of spine, he goes along to get along…. Except that no Republican nominee running against Obama will ever be able to get along in the national election.
Having Newt as President would be a big mistake. He's already stated that his ego is so large that if presented with a Supreme Court ruling he didn't like, he'd ignore it. That's a very dangerous precedent to give future Presidents. And you think he'll reduce the size and scope of government? Dream on. He likes gov't subsidies and individual mandates and his form of big gov't.
Careful, Marlow, on attributing Newt's win to voters simply having fun sticking it to the media. Our votes are too precious, and this one too far-reaching, to be called merely caprice.
Newt is a stronger candidate than Romney on several fronts, most fundamentally that his speech and style have captured the voice so blatantly lacking in the other candidates.
Methinks if Newt just continues this line of campaign speak, he'll not only talk his way into the White House but actually get many of his common sense policies passed and implemented. He might even end up believing himself.
Yes, and almost every time Romney says someting about Obama, he starts by saying "he's a good guy".
Either Romney is lying through his teeth to appease and get votes, or he is blind and shallow. And either way, our soldiers are not going to stand for crap like that.
No, debates don't determine the nominee; popular perception of a candidate as "our kind of guy" does so. The debates are an element in the process, but they don't necessarily command the process.
Mitt Romney hasn't done a good enough job at presenting himself to conservatives or GOP allegiants as "our kind of guy" to win their enduring support. Gingrich has flanked him. Whether he (or Santorum) can recover, we can only wait and see.
I need look no further than the Oval Office to see why I can't possibly withhold my vote, because the country is at stake. Just pardon me if I don't have any passion for the remaining candidates.
Newt has radar for questions that are based on left wing bias and assumptions, he realizes the dishonesty of these questions and turns them on their head. This, Mitt is incapable of.
Newt, Newt, Newt.
Whatever happened to the conservative candidates? Where are Jindal, Rubio, Christie, Palin, Ryan…
Did the MSM scare them off?
We conservatives are looking for another Reagan. We seem to forget that it really took four years in the Whitehouse to have him.
How about a president who sends,……..
our economy,.."off shore".
the media is the curtain all leftists hide behind.. destroy it and the rest will take care of it's self..
The real issue is leftards who espouse economic equality which is pure snake oil. It's all about control on the left. Obamacare is a shining example of the lefts idiocy. It shall bankrupt our nation while vastly lowering the quality of healthcare. Carbon credits, hahahahahaha! The left wants to be sold a fantasy that cannot work and shall deliver shared misery and death. Not on my watch pal, no f.ing way. Don't even bother with a response BoBo, it won't add up and I ain't playing with your mental incapacities. Yep, I know your perfect BoBo, perfect moron.
It is said that Newt Gingrich has a 56% disapproval rating,…….
among the members of congress.
Well if you couple that with the 80% disapproval rating,…..
of congress among the people of this country and,…..
I would say Newt has a win win situation.
You nailed it! Mitt wants to be a nice guy when it comes to Obama yet he will play dirty with fellow Repugs. Says a great deal regarding the content of his character. Treat the enemy with dignity yet your compatriots with disdain. No sale!
Yet your fine with Obama trampling the Constituition? Anybody but Obama 2012! Focus on the end zone please. They are all a bunch of insider mush, but they are a far cry better then POSPOTUS.
Yep, he provides the spark of leadership that has been missing for a long time.
"Newt had a monster advantage [in Florida] over Mitt a few weeks ago, then Romney erased that and is currently way out in front."
Yeah, I'm not buying it. Polling in Florida is easily manipulated. It's a huge state, with very different demographics in different areas. So if you want your poll to favor one candidate, you concentrate on an area that favors that candidate. If you prefer another, you choose another area.
The fact is, the Florida election will be decided by voters along the I-4 corridor. That's where I live. And these voters are going to break for Newt.
Mitt paid false lip service to the tea party and it was horribly skewed, false and transparent. Don't tell me your with me when I know to my core you are not Mitt, just pisses me off and steels my resolve/stuborness.
One needs to look NO further as to the importance of debate performance than 2 very notable ones: the Nixon-JFK debate in 1960 which was the first-ever debate broadcast live on TV– which featured a profusely sweaty glistening upper lip on Nixon– and a perfectly dry, calm JFK. The subliminal visual impact of that one debate tipped public opinion in favor of JFK. The other was the famous Reagan-Carter debate, in which Reagan uttered the famous words "THERE YOU GO AGAIN" after Carter uttered some nonsense about centralized government control of the economy. That one comment by Reagan reassured the public that he was indeed serious about getting federal central goverment controls off the backs of the private sector to unleash the American economy and literally grow our way out of the economic wreckage of the 1970's. Works EVERY time it's tried.
Blanket pardon from me my friend. Your eyes are firmly fixed on the bigger problem. Anything but Obama…Anything, as long as it's constitutionally eligible!
Absolutely — and I'd bet a pretty penny that quite a lot of conservatives feel exactly the same!
Yet your fine with Obama trampling the Constituition?
I demand no trampling of the rights our gov is *supposed* to protect.
Anybody but Obama 2012
And if that "anybody" is worse than Obama (I'd put Santorum in that category)? We have to be careful with our zeal to get rid of BO that we don't elect an even worse devil than the one we already know.
Good point.
Hopefully, America will realize the Obama presidency is like having generic brand canned creamed spinach with filet mignon. Not only does it look like crap, taste like crap, but leaves a taste in your mouth like crap.
I'm not overly concerned the people recognize Obama for what he is, I'm concerned at the level of fraud which will be done to keep him there.
Never let your Enemeys define the War! If Rommney would like to be POTUS he must step and Say " The Emperor Has No Clothes" and I agree with the others Quit attacking each other it's O that you want to be different than!
This is where the fight ought to be…… We are battling for the minds and hearts of middle America. It should be in the left's "face" continually.
We've all seen this……………
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for > everyone.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his > situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
It's time to shove this in the left's "face"…..
"he goes along to get along"
that's exactly why i will not vote for romney.
Pssssst…. hey Petro… Just an observation… But me thinks that filet mignon might just be tofu.
yes. i don't believe romney has the b*lls to take it to obama face to face. thats not the person we need to oust obama. we need someone who isn't afraid to take risks. without that obama will come out on top.
Newt changes the discussion instead of debating the question, and neither the MSM or President Obama has a counter for this tactic.
In reading this article yesterday, http://mywtfblog.com/2012/01/media-options/ , it became clear who is waking up the Tea Party movement that has been mostly silent during the campaigns. Last week was a turning point in the primaries as we will see over the next month.
i guess thats more dangerous than obama ignoring the constitution? at least gingrich can make a decision. not wait around to see what everyone else thinks first then leads from behind. gingrich will not lead from behind. he will take the bull by the horns as he already has.
Sure hope you are right there John, but,………
you folks do have that "chad" problem,….
under control now,..right,…….???????
great post there Stan,…….
sounds down right Newtish.
OT:
Have an addition to the family, an 8 week old chocolate lab I'm picking up Saturday. Biggest of a 13 pup litter. Looks like a grizzly bear.
We don't want to be slaves of communists. It is that simple. We want freedom for ourselves and future generations. Most political establishment and press, including Fox, don't seem to see the real threat. The political establishment and all the political experts think this election is just another horse race like all the others. Newt is the only candidate that demonstrates the ability to fight and somewhat address the real threat. The "experts" advise that it is a matter of giving us the right message. They come closer when they say we are rebelling against the establishment, but they still don't get it. They are treating us like we are rebellious teenagers whose parents won't let us stay out late. No, Bozos, it is totalitarian government we don't want and that is a fight accommodating Republicans can't win for us. The political establishment, like frogs in a slowly boiling pot, are so immersed in the totalitarian sickness that is Washington DC, that they cannot see the real threat. We need someone who can see it and has the ability to fight it. Newt is not ideal because he is part of the establishment, but at this point,… he is a start. At least he is calling out the real threat which are the totalitarian Democrats and the MSM, …the Democrat party's propaganda machine. The rest of the political establishment, ie, media, experts, Republicans, are in full blown denial.
Great quote!
Yep, a big steaming pile of wussbag running the single most generic unexciting campaign in my lifetime…again. Let's help McRomney advance to strike three for being so boring and bland. Hey Mitt, a second grader figured out we need leadership, why cant you?
Tax returns are only an issue for Leftists, who will vote for their Supreme Leader, no matter what.
Therefore, they are NOT an issue.
It's mostly a difference of style I believe. Their view are very similar on issues.
I have concerns about all the potential nominees, which is why I'm also keeping my eye on the Congressional races. Regardless of who wins in November, we have to have the right people in Congress. Either to stop Obama from further abuses or to keep a GOP President on the right path.
The Supreme Court should be challenged when it oversteps it's constitutional authority (as it frequently does). That's what SEPARATION OF POWERS is all about.
I call it courage of conviction. Some folks got their panties in a knot over Newts statements regarding wrong verdicts from the Supremes. I kind of like someone holding their feet to the fire. After all the President of the United States of America IS the leader of the free world, NOT the Supreme Court. sheesh! Apparently some panties didn't unwind, time for a product safety recall?!
I'd argue there is no one worse then Obama.
John, I don't disagree with you. I have come to the conclusion that real change is going to require bloodshed. Too much money and greed has been allowed to sway US away from our founding guiding principles. I am not encouraging it, but it seems inevitable if we are to retain our freedoms. The left and the rinos are playing an evil evil game and if not checked shall lead to action. Establishment versus American.
THAT is exactly the problem. Obama is a puppet and we know it and he knows it.
It's like having someone who doesn't know one iota about medicine operate on a person with all kinds of coaching on the sidelines. The patient will obviously die.
The world sees us better than we see us.
For example NDAA, anyone who supported, voted and signed NDAA is guilty of treason. They will argue that it was poorly worded and never intended to subvert the Constituition, I'd argue the Constituition was very brief and very clear. We somehow lost our ability for clarity in 200+ years? I don't think so!
They have been silent for a reason.
Oh, you must mean George Bush spending one trillion dollars on the Iraq war.
I see. Obviously, the uninsured never, ever get sick, so you must be correct, moron.
Why? Show me the law that states a presidential candidate must release tax returns. It is just an attempt by the far-left morons like you to wage more class warefare. Why hasn't Obama released his college transcripts? When someone hides their past they no business running for anything.
They are not an issue? I never knew Newton was a "leftist". http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitic...
How about when they LIE, as B. Hussein Obama has, on EVERY issue he's spoken on.
Does he have any business being President???
I am still waiting for Obamas promised healthcare reform, all we got so far is a steaming pile of s..t! Nice try sport, talking point number three. You want to debate let's try facts not spin, something you have shown repeatedly you are incapable.
Ooh ooh, I got this one…HELL NO!!!!
Memo to RNC: You don't accomodate the DNC and the Radical left. Years ago, they called us "the enemy." The Marquis of Queensbury rules apply ONLY in the boxing ring, NOT the political arena. The DNC and the rest of the radical left have been beating up on you dolts and you just love it don't. Well out here in the hinterlands of the unwashed masses, we're sick and tired of "taking it." YOU IDIOTS IN THE RNC CAN'T TAKE THE GLOVES OFF…YOU CRAZY FOOLISH B@ST@^D$ WON'T EVEN GET OFF THE FLOOR!!! YOU IDIOTS IN THE RNC LOVE GETTING PUMMELED IN THE FACE…WHAT WIMPS YOU ARE AND YOU WANT ME TO CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO YOU?!?!? WHAT A BAD INVESTMENT! WE PLAYED NICE 4 YEARS AGO…HIS NAME WAS JOHN MCCAIN!You RNC clowns don't get it…WE, the unwashed masses want a fight, we want a bare knuckle brawl 'cause we are not afraid and we know that once we beating the h#ll out of the libs, these leftist bully cowards will fold like a house of cards. If you RNC pukes don't want to fight, go home, we don't even want you milk toasts on the sidelines, you'll just get in the way!
Heck I'd love his whole history but I'd settle for his real name.
the guy is a complete fiction.
Well written and well done!
In case you had not noticed, we do not care what Congress says-THEY are the problem.
Funny, thought all those War contractors were American companies.
As much as I really like Newt and until last week felt that Mitt was the safe alternative, Mitts reluctance to attack the liberal media shows how timid Mitt is. These are not timid times, Obama and the leftist loons are dirty and will continue to play dirty. There is no rising above the fray, the stakes are too high. Mitt has to step it up and take a lesson from Newt on street fighting, as that is where the battle for the soul of America will be fought. The next Republican/ Conservative President will be able to fight toe to toe with the socialists and their lap dog media. Think how hard Washington and Lincoln fought for their principles. With that in mind, who do you want to restore Washington to the People? Newt connects with all frustrated conservatives who feel as he does. Lets just pray that Newt is able to find a "manager" to keep focused for the next 8 years. Give them Hell on earth Newt!!!!
The real battle my fellow citizens is kicking out Congress, yes, all Democrats and RINOS. We've learned a lot since Democrats took control of Congress in 2007. Lightbulbs outlawed, home gardens outlawed, over the counter vitamins outlawed, wars for Muslims, repairing mosques in Egypt, oil drilling for Brasil and Soros but not for us and continued increased debt.
Newt deserves kudos for making this point. No president can change a thing with a socialist controlled Congress.
So the Left supports committed marriages? LOL! You sure you want to position yourselves this way? It is a failing when placing a man ahead of principles. You end up with egg on your face.
HMMM. I guess all the money spent in Iraq on infrastructure, etc, was really spent in America. My bad.
Rasmussen poll out today has Gingrich leading Mitt 41% to 32%.
Reallly. I am sooorrry for the spin. I will take your word on it. The uninsured never, ever get sick. As a result, when the hospitals state they write off about 20% of their bills, I will simply call them a "steaming pile of s..t!"
I left out a sentence….
This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in the
Czech Republic as published in the Prager Zeitung of 28 April 2011.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of
entrusting an inexperienced man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama
presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved
electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem
is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere
symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should
not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their
prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to
survive a multitude of idiots such as those who made him their
president."
He will release them when college transcripts become relevant in a presidential contest.
Sort of like, "Mission Accomplished".
Great article. I do believe the MSM and academia are the source of our problems and Newt is the man to go after that problem. Until our media is held accountable for their deceptive practices, especially that of lying by omission, conservatives will not be able to advance their philosophy….we will always just be on the defensive. I for one am tired of always being on the defensive. The tables must be turned. My eyes were opened during the last presidential election on how I have been deceived most of my life by the MSM. I saw how Palin was crucified and then how bogus ethic charges led to her resignation. Now looking back, I can see the same thing was being done to Newt. All ethic charges were bogus.
Hoo ray for the I-4 people! i hope Newt has an even bigger win in FL than he did in SC.
Remember that Newt knows our soldiers…he knows and has the same mindset. He taught US Army Generals in combat operations. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maC5G2UsmNc
Again moron, show me the law that states tax returns are required to be released by presidential candidates.
I'm not surprised. Florida likes fighters, thinkers and visionaries. Newt fits the bill quite nicely.
LOL
Yeah, I think the "hanging chad" thing has been taken care of.
Agreed, but the proper way to address that is not by executive fiat. That's an Obama-type play and it has no business in our gov't.
Why do people keep saying that? Just because I'm against Newt trampling my rights doesn't mean I'm for someone else doing it.
I'm an I-4 corridor voter too….voting for Newt this week and so are many, many people I know.
I hope BO is defeated in every state but CA – so they both "learn a lesson". Go get 'em Newt!
Thank you Mr. Marlow. people aren't in love with Newt. They're in love with the fact that he's willing to stand up and fight.
You mean like a Metrosexual Teleprompter Reader who has broken every promise and spent millions hiding his past?
Meanwhile, my canned comment that seems to virtually only apply to you regressives. Go figure.
Use of LOL in a post is an intellectual white flag of surrender, and a trademark of liberal posts. It says, “Look at me. I have nothing of substance to offer. I am intellectually beneath everyone here, but I will compensate for my inferiority by assuming an air of supreme arrogance". It's the same with virtually all regressive posts. It's their calling card of ignorance and defeat.
Bo, you really are not on your game today, much like Nebraska playing mid level Big Ten teams.
From madman79:
Obama has an impressive list of accomplishments!
First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.
First President to violate the War Powers Act.
First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
First President to defy a Federal Judge’s court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.
First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
First President to spend a trillion dollars on ‘shovel-ready’ jobs when there was no such thing as ‘shovel-ready’ jobs.
First President to abrogate bankruptcy law and turn over control of major companies to his union supporters.
First President to abrogate bankruptcy law and turn over control of major companies to his union supporters.
First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.
First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
First President to arbitrarily usurp congress, declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.
First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which State they are allowed to locate a factory.
First President to join with a foreign country and file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office.
First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.
First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
First President to go on multiple global ‘apology tours’.
First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.
First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
First President to repeat the Holy Qur’an and tell us the Islamic call to worship is the most beautiful sound on earth.
First President able to break all these laws, be openly corrupt and get by with treason, simply because he’s black.
Now, do you want me to list his lengthy record accomplishments on the economic side alone?
You really don't have a F***ING CLUE do you Bo?
Obammy=Carter, Newt = Reagan, 2012=1980 History is repeating itself, Conservatives have reached their breaking point with waste, corruption, big government, socialism, cronyism, weak world view and a petulent, thin skinned man-child bowing to everybody else except the American people and their traditional allies. Newt has awakened a hunger for an America filled with hope for everyone, not class warfare. A restoration of the pride of everything America used to stand for. Unless Mitt takes the gloves off, he will suffer a second failed Presidential run. Tough times and tough battles require a leader who will fight as though the future of America is at stake, not another RINO. Rinos have acquiessed and enabled the socialists.and brought this great Nation to the brink.
I think our gentle author, Mr. Marlow, has it right.
What a wonderful day it will be when the theme of this post which is Obama, or whoever he is, is not the problem he is the symptom of the problem becomes the national meme. Boy oh boy. Once everyone is talking about THAT we are on our way to victory. If you love your country do not vote Democrat for anybody running for anything. Once they start working for a living they will not have time and energy to "termite" us into subjugation.
Short answer…………………YES!!!!
Any more questions.
Much more refreshing than Obama's hopeless, helpless and deceitful mantras of:
"I've said all along"
"I'm on record as saying"
"I've said in the past"
etc.
I see doctor. I have an idea for you. Go to your hospital's administration and ask them their percentage of write offs.
I will put on my tin foil hat so we can communicate better.
So the pattern is when the leftist doo gooder media makes a suggestion, smart people do the opposite.
Go back to our Founders. When Jefferson, Adams, and Lincoln didn't like what the Supreme Court did, they ignored the rulings. They set the precedent for ignoring unconstitutional rulings from the Supreme Court. The Founders wanted the judicial to be the least important branch of government because they feared an unelected judicary legislating from the bench.
People say that Newt being an outcast among his fellow politicians for a time was a bad thing. I say its a good sign. Any guy that can be the enemy of both parties and still be a strong candidate is good in my book. The fact that the media hates him doesn't hurt. His colorful past is a strength, too. It's hard to dig up a mistress when he keeps marrying them.
Yes and Obamacare is so wonderful that a hundred groups (mostly unions and other Obama supporters) have gotten WAIVERS from it because THEY CAN'T AFFORD IT.
If it was so wonderful, the President and Congress should have been required to be on it, but funnily enough, they excused themselves from it. Sounds like tyranny to me – freedom for me, but not for thee.
Spare us. We know your head is so far up Obama's @ss that everytime he opens his mouth we can see your smiling little idiot face.
You must be logged in to post a comment.