Comments on: Two Fish, One Barrel: Deconstructing Andrew Sullivan’s ‘The Breitbart Standard,’ Demolishing Conor Friedersdorf’s ‘The Right’s Lesser Media’

By: Wanda_Fucan

Wanda_Fucan — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:43:23 +0000

So did they call?

By: waicool

waicool — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:16:02 +0000

More power to you AB. Keep fighting the good fight.

By: rockdbay

rockdbay — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:48:11 +0000

It is going down like a Porta Pottie, in high seas, because it has more BS in it than Andrew Breitbart's critics.

By: mendelbot

mendelbot — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:54:38 +0000

There is an answer, but it's not ressentment, it's not merely reason, nor merely the affectation of gentleness.

By: Snertly

Snertly — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:24:23 +0000

Certainly nothing intentionally antisemitic in the posting you replied to, and I don't see anything that could be interpreted as accidentally antisemitic. So, to what are you referring?

By: Obsta

Obsta — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:04:04 +0000

Nothing like a little antisemitism to sweeten the standard leftist pot of self-contradictory conspiracy theories.

By: Obsta

Obsta — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:55:43 +0000

The AP story about the British High Court is a blockbuster in disguise: it allows us to bring back to the public the sickening truth of Bill Clinton's treason 1993-2001, and the fact that even Tony Blair (who probably appointed the Court now trying to screw up the American & British intelligence services sharing information), quit sharing intelligence with the U.S. after he learned Clinton was little more than a Chinese flunky. Blair did that to protect the British from Chinese spying. To learn more about that, go back and read the books and articles by The Washington Times's Bill Gertz. Among them you'll find at least one article by Gertz detailing the British cut-off.